Evaluation and Optimization of Pharmacokinetic Models for in Vitro to in Vivo Extrapolation of Estrogenic Activity for Environmental Chemicals.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluation and Optimization of Pharmacokinetic Models for in Vitro to in Vivo Extrapolation of Estrogenic Activity for Environmental Chemicals. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Casey, Warren M.1, Xiaoqing Chang2, Allen, David G.2, Ceger, Patricia C.2, Choksi, Neepa Y.2, Jui-Hua Hsieh3, Wetmore, Barbara A.4, Ferguson, Stephen S.1, DeVito, Michael J.1, Sprankle, Catherine S.2, Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.1 nicole.kleinstreuer@nih.gov |
| Source: | Environmental Health Perspectives. Sep2018, Vol. 126 Issue 9, p1-14. 14p. 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 4 Graphs. |
| Subject Terms: | *Animal experimentation, *Carcinogens, Estrogen antagonists, Pharmacokinetics, Research funding, Rodents, Statistics, Data analysis, Government regulation, Predictive tests, Data analysis software, Statistical models, Signal peptides, Descriptive statistics, In vitro studies, In vivo studies |
| Abstract: | BACKGROUND: To effectively incorporate in vitro data into regulatory use, confidence must be established in the quantitative extrapolation of in vitro activity to relevant end points in animals or humans. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate and optimize in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approaches using in vitro estrogen receptor (ER) activity to predict estrogenic effects measured in rodent uterotrophic studies. METHODS: We evaluated three pharmacokinetic (PK) models with varying complexities to extrapolate in vitro to in vivo dosimetry for a group of 29 ER agonists, using data from validated in vitro [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) ToxCast? ER model] and in vivo (uterotrophic) methods. In vitro activity values were adjusted using mass-balance equations to estimate intracellular exposure via an enrichment factor (EF), and steady-state model calculations were adjusted using fraction of unbound chemical in the plasma (fu) to approximate bioavailability. Accuracy of each model-adjustment combination was assessed by comparing model predictions with lowest effect levels (LELs) from guideline uterotrophic studies. RESULTS: We found little difference in model predictive performance based on complexity or route-specific modifications. Simple adjustments, applied to account for in vitro intracellular exposure (EF) or chemical bioavailability (fu), resulted in significant improvements in the predictive performance of all models. CONCLUSION: Computational IVIVE approaches accurately estimate chemical exposure levels that elicit positive responses in the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. The simplest model had the best overall performance for predicting both oral (PPK_EF) and injection (PPK_fu) LELs from guideline uterotrophic studies, is freely available, and can be parameterized entirely using freely available in silico tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Environmental Health Perspectives is the property of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | GreenFILE |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: 8gh DbLabel: GreenFILE An: 131863422 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluation and Optimization of Pharmacokinetic Models for in Vitro to in Vivo Extrapolation of Estrogenic Activity for Environmental Chemicals. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Casey%2C+Warren+M%2E%22">Casey, Warren M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xiaoqing+Chang%22">Xiaoqing Chang</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Allen%2C+David+G%2E%22">Allen, David G.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ceger%2C+Patricia+C%2E%22">Ceger, Patricia C.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Choksi%2C+Neepa+Y%2E%22">Choksi, Neepa Y.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jui-Hua+Hsieh%22">Jui-Hua Hsieh</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wetmore%2C+Barbara+A%2E%22">Wetmore, Barbara A.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferguson%2C+Stephen+S%2E%22">Ferguson, Stephen S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22DeVito%2C+Michael+J%2E%22">DeVito, Michael J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sprankle%2C+Catherine+S%2E%22">Sprankle, Catherine S.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kleinstreuer%2C+Nicole+C%2E%22">Kleinstreuer, Nicole C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> nicole.kleinstreuer@nih.gov</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Environmental+Health+Perspectives%22">Environmental Health Perspectives</searchLink>. Sep2018, Vol. 126 Issue 9, p1-14. 14p. 2 Diagrams, 3 Charts, 4 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Animal+experimentation%22">Animal experimentation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Carcinogens%22">Carcinogens</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Estrogen+antagonists%22">Estrogen antagonists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pharmacokinetics%22">Pharmacokinetics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rodents%22">Rodents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+regulation%22">Government regulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictive+tests%22">Predictive tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+models%22">Statistical models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Signal+peptides%22">Signal peptides</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22In+vitro+studies%22">In vitro studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22In+vivo+studies%22">In vivo studies</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: BACKGROUND: To effectively incorporate in vitro data into regulatory use, confidence must be established in the quantitative extrapolation of in vitro activity to relevant end points in animals or humans. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate and optimize in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approaches using in vitro estrogen receptor (ER) activity to predict estrogenic effects measured in rodent uterotrophic studies. METHODS: We evaluated three pharmacokinetic (PK) models with varying complexities to extrapolate in vitro to in vivo dosimetry for a group of 29 ER agonists, using data from validated in vitro [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) ToxCast? ER model] and in vivo (uterotrophic) methods. In vitro activity values were adjusted using mass-balance equations to estimate intracellular exposure via an enrichment factor (EF), and steady-state model calculations were adjusted using fraction of unbound chemical in the plasma (fu) to approximate bioavailability. Accuracy of each model-adjustment combination was assessed by comparing model predictions with lowest effect levels (LELs) from guideline uterotrophic studies. RESULTS: We found little difference in model predictive performance based on complexity or route-specific modifications. Simple adjustments, applied to account for in vitro intracellular exposure (EF) or chemical bioavailability (fu), resulted in significant improvements in the predictive performance of all models. CONCLUSION: Computational IVIVE approaches accurately estimate chemical exposure levels that elicit positive responses in the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. The simplest model had the best overall performance for predicting both oral (PPK_EF) and injection (PPK_fu) LELs from guideline uterotrophic studies, is freely available, and can be parameterized entirely using freely available in silico tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Environmental Health Perspectives is the property of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=8gh&AN=131863422 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1289/EHP1655 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Animal experimentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Carcinogens Type: general – SubjectFull: Estrogen antagonists Type: general – SubjectFull: Pharmacokinetics Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Rodents Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Government regulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictive tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical models Type: general – SubjectFull: Signal peptides Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: In vitro studies Type: general – SubjectFull: In vivo studies Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluation and Optimization of Pharmacokinetic Models for in Vitro to in Vivo Extrapolation of Estrogenic Activity for Environmental Chemicals. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Casey, Warren M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xiaoqing Chang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Allen, David G. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ceger, Patricia C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Choksi, Neepa Y. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jui-Hua Hsieh – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wetmore, Barbara A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ferguson, Stephen S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: DeVito, Michael J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sprankle, Catherine S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kleinstreuer, Nicole C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Text: Sep2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00916765 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 126 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Environmental Health Perspectives Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |