APA (7th ed.) Citation

JS, K., KS, C., DW, J., KJ, C., YH, P., SG, S., . . . Kim, J. (2011). Step-and-shoot prospectively ECG-gated vs. retrospectively ECG-gated with tube current modulation coronary CT angiography using 128-slice MDCT patients with chest pain: Diagnostic performance and radiation dose. Acta Radiologica, 52(8), 860. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110006

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

JS, Kim, et al. "Step-and-shoot Prospectively ECG-gated Vs. Retrospectively ECG-gated with Tube Current Modulation Coronary CT Angiography Using 128-slice MDCT Patients with Chest Pain: Diagnostic Performance and Radiation Dose." Acta Radiologica 52, no. 8 (2011): 860. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110006.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

JS, Kim, et al. "Step-and-shoot Prospectively ECG-gated Vs. Retrospectively ECG-gated with Tube Current Modulation Coronary CT Angiography Using 128-slice MDCT Patients with Chest Pain: Diagnostic Performance and Radiation Dose." Acta Radiologica, vol. 52, no. 8, 2011, p. 860, https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110006.