APA (7th ed.) Citation

Luraschi, R., Barrera-Avalos, C., Vallejos-Vidal, E., Alarcón, J., Mella-Torres, A., Hernández, F., . . . Sandino, A. M. (2022). The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Luraschi, Roberto, et al. "The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes." Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology 2022: 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Luraschi, Roberto, et al. "The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes." Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, 2022, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2594564.