APA (7th ed.) Citation

Early, S., Mahar, A., Oka, R., & Newton, P. (2005). Biomechanical Comparison of Lumbosacral Fixation Using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II Sacropelvic Fixation: Advantage of Using Locked Proximal Fixation. Spine (03622436), 30(12), 1396. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000166530.87923.5b

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Early, Sean, Andrew Mahar, Richard Oka, and Peter Newton. "Biomechanical Comparison of Lumbosacral Fixation Using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II Sacropelvic Fixation: Advantage of Using Locked Proximal Fixation." Spine (03622436) 30, no. 12 (2005): 1396. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000166530.87923.5b.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Early, Sean, et al. "Biomechanical Comparison of Lumbosacral Fixation Using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II Sacropelvic Fixation: Advantage of Using Locked Proximal Fixation." Spine (03622436), vol. 30, no. 12, 2005, p. 1396, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000166530.87923.5b.