APA (7th ed.) Citation

Herbert, A., & Johnson, J. (2002). IS IT REALITY OR AN ILLUSION THAT LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY IS BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL SMEARS? AUTHORS' REPLY. Cytopathology, 13(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2002.00409.x

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Herbert, Amanda, and Jane Johnson. "IS IT REALITY OR AN ILLUSION THAT LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY IS BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL SMEARS? AUTHORS' REPLY." Cytopathology 13, no. 2 (2002): 133. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2002.00409.x.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Herbert, Amanda, and Jane Johnson. "IS IT REALITY OR AN ILLUSION THAT LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY IS BETTER THAN CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL SMEARS? AUTHORS' REPLY." Cytopathology, vol. 13, no. 2, 2002, p. 133, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2002.00409.x.