CT and MR findings in neoplastic perineural spread along the vidian nerve.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	CT and MR findings in neoplastic perineural spread along the vidian nerve.
Authors:	Blandino, A.¹, Gaeta, M.¹, Minutoli, F.¹, Pandolfo, I.¹
Source:	European Radiology. Mar2000, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p521-526. 6p.
Subjects:	Metastasis, Medical imaging systems, Therapeutics, Histology, Tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Brain tumor diagnosis, Evaluation research, Differential diagnosis, Head & neck cancer, Computed tomography, Research evaluation, Retrospective studies, Peripheral nerve tumors, Research methodology, Research, Comparative studies, Brain tumors, Pterygoid muscles, Innervation
Abstract:	The aims of this article are to describe the findings of perividian tumor spread and to compare the accuracy of MRI and CT in diagnosing perineural metastasis along the vidian nerve. Moreover, the frequency of perividian metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer was evaluated. The CT and MR examinations of 98 consecutive untreated patients with histologically proven head and neck cancer were retrospectively reviewed. We considered as criteria for perineural tumor spread along the vidian nerve the following CT and MR findings: For CT (a) enlargement of the pterygoid canal, (b) erosion of its bony wall, and (c) obliteration of its normal fatty content; and for MR (a) enlargement of the vidian nerve, (b) enhancement of the nerve, and (c) obliteration of fat, particularly in the anterior part of the pterygoid canal. Ten patients met the selected criteria for perineural metastasis, which was bilateral in 3 patients, with a total of 13 vidian metastases. The CT scans demonstrated unilateral involvement of the vidian nerve in 9 patients. The MRI scans showed 13 perineural metastases. In 3 patients MR scans demonstrated involvement of four vidian nerves that appeared normal on CT examinations. The diagnostic difference between CT and MRI was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.04). Perineural spread along the vidian nerve is an event more frequent than previously reported and must be investigated with a careful imaging technique. Although a major limitation of our study is the lack of histological proof, the MR finding of a significant enhancement of the nerve, whether enlarged or normal in size, could be considered very suggestive of this kind of metastatic spreading, particularly if associated with simultaneous involvement of the neighboring structures (pterygopalatine fossa, foramen lacerum, trigeminal branches, etc.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	The aims of this article are to describe the findings of perividian tumor spread and to compare the accuracy of MRI and CT in diagnosing perineural metastasis along the vidian nerve. Moreover, the frequency of perividian metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer was evaluated. The CT and MR examinations of 98 consecutive untreated patients with histologically proven head and neck cancer were retrospectively reviewed. We considered as criteria for perineural tumor spread along the vidian nerve the following CT and MR findings: For CT (a) enlargement of the pterygoid canal, (b) erosion of its bony wall, and (c) obliteration of its normal fatty content; and for MR (a) enlargement of the vidian nerve, (b) enhancement of the nerve, and (c) obliteration of fat, particularly in the anterior part of the pterygoid canal. Ten patients met the selected criteria for perineural metastasis, which was bilateral in 3 patients, with a total of 13 vidian metastases. The CT scans demonstrated unilateral involvement of the vidian nerve in 9 patients. The MRI scans showed 13 perineural metastases. In 3 patients MR scans demonstrated involvement of four vidian nerves that appeared normal on CT examinations. The diagnostic difference between CT and MRI was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.04). Perineural spread along the vidian nerve is an event more frequent than previously reported and must be investigated with a careful imaging technique. Although a major limitation of our study is the lack of histological proof, the MR finding of a significant enhancement of the nerve, whether enlarged or normal in size, could be considered very suggestive of this kind of metastatic spreading, particularly if associated with simultaneous involvement of the neighboring structures (pterygopalatine fossa, foramen lacerum, trigeminal branches, etc.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	09387994
DOI:	10.1007/s003300050089