Prediction and calibration of black soil modeling parameters based on response surface methodology and machine learning algorithms.
Saved in:
| Title: | Prediction and calibration of black soil modeling parameters based on response surface methodology and machine learning algorithms. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wang, Zhipeng1 (AUTHOR) 448465250@qq.com, Ma, Feng2 (AUTHOR), Zhu, Yaonan3 (AUTHOR), Wang, Hongyan4 (AUTHOR), Zhu, Tong1 (AUTHOR) tongzhu@mail.neu.edu.cn, Wang, Youzhao1 (AUTHOR) wangyz@me.neu.edu.cn, Zhao, Chaoyue1 (AUTHOR), Yu, Jin5 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Particulate Science & Technology. 2025, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p534-545. 12p. |
| Subjects: | Black cotton soil, Rolling friction, Machine learning, Static friction, Rolling (Metalwork) |
| Abstract: | Five machine learning algorithms Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), KNN, and XG Boost were used to calibrate the discrete element contact parameters of the black soil by combining the measured data on the black soil and the simulated pile load test. Firstly, the physical parameters of the black soil and the angle of stacking were determined based on physical tests. Next, Plackett-Burman tests were carried out and the following important parameters were obtained: black soil–black soil static friction coefficient, black soil–black soil rolling friction coefficient, and black soil–stainless steel rolling friction coefficient. The simulation parameters that significantly influenced the black soil stacking angles were designed for the steepest climbing tests to optimize a range of values of the significant parameters. Machine learning was performed to determine the optimal model based on the results of the response surface index results. The results show that the decision tree model has better predictive ability and stability for the stacking angle compared to Random Forest, SVR, KNN, and XG Boost models. The best combination of parameters for the black soil-black soil static friction coefficient was 0.956, the black soil–black soil rolling friction coefficient was 0.499, and the black soil–stainless steel rolling friction coefficient was 0.221. The simulation parameters can provide a reference for optimizing the simulation parameters for the subsequent soil particles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Particulate Science & Technology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 184628260 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Prediction and calibration of black soil modeling parameters based on response surface methodology and machine learning algorithms. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Zhipeng%22">Wang, Zhipeng</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> 448465250@qq.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ma%2C+Feng%22">Ma, Feng</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhu%2C+Yaonan%22">Zhu, Yaonan</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Hongyan%22">Wang, Hongyan</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhu%2C+Tong%22">Zhu, Tong</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> tongzhu@mail.neu.edu.cn</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Youzhao%22">Wang, Youzhao</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> wangyz@me.neu.edu.cn</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhao%2C+Chaoyue%22">Zhao, Chaoyue</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yu%2C+Jin%22">Yu, Jin</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Particulate+Science+%26+Technology%22">Particulate Science & Technology</searchLink>. 2025, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p534-545. 12p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Black+cotton+soil%22">Black cotton soil</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rolling+friction%22">Rolling friction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Machine+learning%22">Machine learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Static+friction%22">Static friction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rolling+%28Metalwork%29%22">Rolling (Metalwork)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Five machine learning algorithms Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), KNN, and XG Boost were used to calibrate the discrete element contact parameters of the black soil by combining the measured data on the black soil and the simulated pile load test. Firstly, the physical parameters of the black soil and the angle of stacking were determined based on physical tests. Next, Plackett-Burman tests were carried out and the following important parameters were obtained: black soil–black soil static friction coefficient, black soil–black soil rolling friction coefficient, and black soil–stainless steel rolling friction coefficient. The simulation parameters that significantly influenced the black soil stacking angles were designed for the steepest climbing tests to optimize a range of values of the significant parameters. Machine learning was performed to determine the optimal model based on the results of the response surface index results. The results show that the decision tree model has better predictive ability and stability for the stacking angle compared to Random Forest, SVR, KNN, and XG Boost models. The best combination of parameters for the black soil-black soil static friction coefficient was 0.956, the black soil–black soil rolling friction coefficient was 0.499, and the black soil–stainless steel rolling friction coefficient was 0.221. The simulation parameters can provide a reference for optimizing the simulation parameters for the subsequent soil particles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Particulate Science & Technology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=184628260 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/02726351.2025.2476672 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 534 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Black cotton soil Type: general – SubjectFull: Rolling friction Type: general – SubjectFull: Machine learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Static friction Type: general – SubjectFull: Rolling (Metalwork) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Prediction and calibration of black soil modeling parameters based on response surface methodology and machine learning algorithms. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Zhipeng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ma, Feng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhu, Yaonan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Hongyan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhu, Tong – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Youzhao – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhao, Chaoyue – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yu, Jin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: 2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 02726351 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 43 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Particulate Science & Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |