View in EDS

Hydrologic regionalisation impacts on wet-weather control selection.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Hydrologic regionalisation impacts on wet-weather control selection.
Authors: Huber, W. C.1 wayne.huber@oregonstate.edu, Wells, W. J.1, Besaw, I. K.1, Leisenring, M. A.2
Source: Water Science & Technology. 2006, Vol. 54 Issue 6/7, p485-492. 8p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs.
Subjects: Hydrologic models, Best management practices (Pollution prevention), Pollution prevention, Water distribution, Water supply, United States. Environmental Protection Agency, Runoff, Weather control
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: Continuous simulation is performed using the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) to evaluate regional differences around the United States in hydrologic and water quality performance of wet-weather controls. Controls are characterised as being limited by peak inflow rate (i.e. any device with little or no storage, such as screens, filters and some proprietary devices) or by storage capacity (e.g. ponds, tanks). For flow-limited devices, results are presented in the form of percentage of annual runoff volume captured (passing through the device) for a given inflow capacity. For storage-limited devices, results are presented in two forms: percentage of annual runoff volume captured as a function of unit basin size and drawdown (drain) time, and as a percentage of total suspended solids captured, for the same two variables. Regional differences are apparent, driven mainly by variations in rainfall patterns around the country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Water Science & Technology is the property of IWA Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 23323372
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Hydrologic regionalisation impacts on wet-weather control selection.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huber%2C+W%2E+C%2E%22">Huber, W. C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> wayne.huber@oregonstate.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wells%2C+W%2E+J%2E%22">Wells, W. J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Besaw%2C+I%2E+K%2E%22">Besaw, I. K.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leisenring%2C+M%2E+A%2E%22">Leisenring, M. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Water+Science+%26+Technology%22">Water Science & Technology</searchLink>. 2006, Vol. 54 Issue 6/7, p485-492. 8p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 3 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hydrologic+models%22">Hydrologic models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Best+management+practices+%28Pollution+prevention%29%22">Best management practices (Pollution prevention)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pollution+prevention%22">Pollution prevention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Water+distribution%22">Water distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Water+supply%22">Water supply</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+Environmental+Protection+Agency%22">United States. Environmental Protection Agency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Runoff%22">Runoff</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Weather+control%22">Weather control</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Continuous simulation is performed using the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) to evaluate regional differences around the United States in hydrologic and water quality performance of wet-weather controls. Controls are characterised as being limited by peak inflow rate (i.e. any device with little or no storage, such as screens, filters and some proprietary devices) or by storage capacity (e.g. ponds, tanks). For flow-limited devices, results are presented in the form of percentage of annual runoff volume captured (passing through the device) for a given inflow capacity. For storage-limited devices, results are presented in two forms: percentage of annual runoff volume captured as a function of unit basin size and drawdown (drain) time, and as a percentage of total suspended solids captured, for the same two variables. Regional differences are apparent, driven mainly by variations in rainfall patterns around the country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Water Science & Technology is the property of IWA Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=23323372
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.2166/wst.2006.604
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 485
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Hydrologic models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Best management practices (Pollution prevention)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pollution prevention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Water distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Water supply
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States. Environmental Protection Agency
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Runoff
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Weather control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Hydrologic regionalisation impacts on wet-weather control selection.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huber, W. C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wells, W. J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Besaw, I. K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leisenring, M. A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 09
              Text: 2006
              Type: published
              Y: 2006
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02731223
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 54
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6/7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Water Science & Technology
              Type: main
ResultId 1