The unquantifiable as a measure of good education.
Saved in:
| Title: | The unquantifiable as a measure of good education. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | O'Shea, Andrew1 (AUTHOR) andrew.oshea@dcu.ie, Lorenzi, Francesca2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Ethics & Education. Nov2015, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p361-371. 11p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Educational tests & measurements, *Rating of students, *Education research, *Science education, *Teenagers, *Secondary education, Ethics research, Ethics |
| Abstract: | This paper develops a dialogue on value and measurement in education that began at a special symposium at ECER in September 2015. The paper seeks to continue the dialogue by commenting on the main respondent’s contribution from Network 9. We hope to clarify how different sides of the assessment debate can be misunderstood by others. What emerges in our paper is suggestive but nonetheless points to how thinking in opposing camps can limit our understanding of assessment as a human activity. Taking up key points made by the respondent to the symposium, we focus on the comparison between the requirements of design in technological problem-solving situations and those that arise when we take seriously the requirements of assessment and valuing as a human activity. This discussion sets up a wider analysis of the problem of ethics across the sciences and humanities historically. While remaining tentative, the discussion points to a particular problem related to our ability to defend practical rationality against the dominance of technical rationality in modern European society. As a way of counteracting the preponderance of more technical measures, the paper concludes by offering a heuristic metaphor for understanding an unquantifiable living practice like education. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Ethics & Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 112260951 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The unquantifiable as a measure of good education. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22O'Shea%2C+Andrew%22">O'Shea, Andrew</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> andrew.oshea@dcu.ie</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lorenzi%2C+Francesca%22">Lorenzi, Francesca</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ethics+%26+Education%22">Ethics & Education</searchLink>. Nov2015, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p361-371. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rating+of+students%22">Rating of students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+research%22">Education research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+education%22">Science education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teenagers%22">Teenagers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+education%22">Secondary education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics+research%22">Ethics research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper develops a dialogue on value and measurement in education that began at a special symposium at ECER in September 2015. The paper seeks to continue the dialogue by commenting on the main respondent’s contribution from Network 9. We hope to clarify how different sides of the assessment debate can be misunderstood by others. What emerges in our paper is suggestive but nonetheless points to how thinking in opposing camps can limit our understanding of assessment as a human activity. Taking up key points made by the respondent to the symposium, we focus on the comparison between the requirements of design in technological problem-solving situations and those that arise when we take seriously the requirements of assessment and valuing as a human activity. This discussion sets up a wider analysis of the problem of ethics across the sciences and humanities historically. While remaining tentative, the discussion points to a particular problem related to our ability to defend practical rationality against the dominance of technical rationality in modern European society. As a way of counteracting the preponderance of more technical measures, the paper concludes by offering a heuristic metaphor for understanding an unquantifiable living practice like education. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Ethics & Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=112260951 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/17449642.2015.1106031 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 361 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements Type: general – SubjectFull: Rating of students Type: general – SubjectFull: Education research Type: general – SubjectFull: Science education Type: general – SubjectFull: Teenagers Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary education Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics research Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The unquantifiable as a measure of good education. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: O'Shea, Andrew – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lorenzi, Francesca IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2015 Type: published Y: 2015 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 17449642 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 10 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Ethics & Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |