Responsibility Boundaries in Global Value Chains: Supplier Audit Prioritizations and Moral Disengagement Among Swedish Firms.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Responsibility Boundaries in Global Value Chains: Supplier Audit Prioritizations and Moral Disengagement Among Swedish Firms.
Authors: Egels-Zandén, Niklas1 niklas.zanden@gu.se
Source: Journal of Business Ethics. Dec2017, Vol. 146 Issue 3, p515-528. 14p. 2 Charts.
Subject Terms: Value chains, Codes of ethics, International economic relations, Workers' rights, Self-regulation of industries, Ethics
Abstract: To address substandard working conditions in global value chains, companies have adopted private regulatory systems governing worker rights. Scholars agree that without onsite factory audits, this private regulation has limited impact at the point of production. Companies, however, audit only a subset of their suppliers, severely restricting their private regulatory attempts. Despite the significance of the placement of suppliers inside or outside firms' 'responsibility boundaries' and despite scholars' having called for more research into how firms prioritize what suppliers to audit, few, if any, systematic studies have examined the topic. This is problematic, as the placement of firms' responsibility boundaries determines what suppliers and workers are included in firms' private regulatory attempts. Based on a study of 12 Swedish firms and the theory of moral disengagement, this paper starts to fill this research gap by exploring how firms' responsibility boundaries are placed. The paper illustrates how firms' responsibility boundary placement is best described as a patchwork with firms defining and delimiting their responsibilities differently. The paper also demonstrates that three supplier types (i.e., the worst, morally justified, and immediate suppliers) are particularly likely to be placed inside firms' responsibility boundaries, while a fourth type (i.e., disregarded suppliers) is likely be placed outside. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 126562838
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Responsibility Boundaries in Global Value Chains: Supplier Audit Prioritizations and Moral Disengagement Among Swedish Firms.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Egels-Zandén%2C+Niklas%22">Egels-Zandén, Niklas</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> niklas.zanden@gu.se</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Business+Ethics%22">Journal of Business Ethics</searchLink>. Dec2017, Vol. 146 Issue 3, p515-528. 14p. 2 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Value+chains%22">Value chains</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Codes+of+ethics%22">Codes of ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+economic+relations%22">International economic relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Workers'+rights%22">Workers' rights</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-regulation+of+industries%22">Self-regulation of industries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: To address substandard working conditions in global value chains, companies have adopted private regulatory systems governing worker rights. Scholars agree that without onsite factory audits, this private regulation has limited impact at the point of production. Companies, however, audit only a subset of their suppliers, severely restricting their private regulatory attempts. Despite the significance of the placement of suppliers inside or outside firms' 'responsibility boundaries' and despite scholars' having called for more research into how firms prioritize what suppliers to audit, few, if any, systematic studies have examined the topic. This is problematic, as the placement of firms' responsibility boundaries determines what suppliers and workers are included in firms' private regulatory attempts. Based on a study of 12 Swedish firms and the theory of moral disengagement, this paper starts to fill this research gap by exploring how firms' responsibility boundaries are placed. The paper illustrates how firms' responsibility boundary placement is best described as a patchwork with firms defining and delimiting their responsibilities differently. The paper also demonstrates that three supplier types (i.e., the worst, morally justified, and immediate suppliers) are particularly likely to be placed inside firms' responsibility boundaries, while a fourth type (i.e., disregarded suppliers) is likely be placed outside. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=126562838
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10551-015-2818-7
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 515
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Value chains
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Codes of ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: International economic relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Workers' rights
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-regulation of industries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Responsibility Boundaries in Global Value Chains: Supplier Audit Prioritizations and Moral Disengagement Among Swedish Firms.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Egels-Zandén, Niklas
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01674544
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 146
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Business Ethics
              Type: main
ResultId 1