MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING: FROM ICONIC MINIMUM TO ABSTRACT MAXIMUM.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING: FROM ICONIC MINIMUM TO ABSTRACT MAXIMUM.
Authors:	Macbeth, Guillermo¹ g.macbeth@conicet.gov.ar, Razumiejczyk, Eugenia²
Source:	Education Sciences & Psychology. 2019, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p82-87. 6p.
Subject Terms:	Cognitive psychology, Short-term memory, Mental representation, Maxima & minima, Electron work function
Abstract:	The aim of this contribution is to provide a state-of-the-art concerned with the mental representation of counterfactual thinking. Counterfactuals are defined from the perspective of cognitive psychology as reasoning processes that consider alternative situations to a factual situation. That is, counterfactual thoughts are conditional thoughts that negate a given fact. Therefore, the key problem of counterfactual mental representation is the representation of negation, its mental modeling and derived inferences. In this context, four prominent findings and three main open issues are revised. Our main conclusion states that counterfactual representation is a function of working memory load and probably operates on the basis of an abstraction gradient. That is, iconic representations might suffice for lower loads and abstract representations might be required for higher working memory loads. Suggestions for a research agenda on counterfactuals are presented. Such agenda is concerned with further theoretical developments and experimental adjustments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Education Sciences & Psychology is the property of Internet Academy, Registered Union and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	The aim of this contribution is to provide a state-of-the-art concerned with the mental representation of counterfactual thinking. Counterfactuals are defined from the perspective of cognitive psychology as reasoning processes that consider alternative situations to a factual situation. That is, counterfactual thoughts are conditional thoughts that negate a given fact. Therefore, the key problem of counterfactual mental representation is the representation of negation, its mental modeling and derived inferences. In this context, four prominent findings and three main open issues are revised. Our main conclusion states that counterfactual representation is a function of working memory load and probably operates on the basis of an abstraction gradient. That is, iconic representations might suffice for lower loads and abstract representations might be required for higher working memory loads. Suggestions for a research agenda on counterfactuals are presented. Such agenda is concerned with further theoretical developments and experimental adjustments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	15121801