The culture of objectivity: Quantification, uncertainty, and the evaluation of risk at NASA.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The culture of objectivity: Quantification, uncertainty, and the evaluation of risk at NASA.
Authors: Feldman, Steven P.1 spf@case.edu
Source: Human Relations. Jun2004, Vol. 57 Issue 6, p691-718. 28p.
Subject Terms: *Authors, Space vehicle accidents, Aeronautics, Literature
Geographic Terms: United States
Company/Entity: United States. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
Abstract: For over three decades social studies of science have investigated 'objectivity' as a central, socially constructed assumption in scientific and engineering work. This literature has seldom been utilized in the study of organizations despite the fact that knowledge production and knowledge use in scientific and engineering organizations are presumed to be objective or independent of individual and social influences. In this article, the social studies of science literature as it conceptualizes and understands objectivity is reviewed. An analysis of the data on decision-making at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) during the years preceding the explosion of Challenger is carried out using concepts from this literature. Data on decision-making at NASA during the years preceding the explosion of Columbia are also analyzed. It is shown that the culture of objectivity at NASA interacted with time pressures to produce a misunderstanding of flight risk. This misunderstanding resulted from two general aspects of NASA's culture: (i) an over-confidence in quantitative data went hand-in-hand with a marginalization of nonquantifiable data, leading to an insensitivity to uncertainty and a loss of organizational memory; and (ii) problem definition and solution creation were constructed as if they were independent of organizational goals, resulting in an inaccurate estimation of risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Human Relations is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 13966110
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The culture of objectivity: Quantification, uncertainty, and the evaluation of risk at NASA.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Feldman%2C+Steven+P%2E%22">Feldman, Steven P.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> spf@case.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Human+Relations%22">Human Relations</searchLink>. Jun2004, Vol. 57 Issue 6, p691-718. 28p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Space+vehicle+accidents%22">Space vehicle accidents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aeronautics%22">Aeronautics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature%22">Literature</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectCompany
  Label: Company/Entity
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+National+Aeronautics+%26+Space+Administration%22">United States. National Aeronautics & Space Administration</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: For over three decades social studies of science have investigated 'objectivity' as a central, socially constructed assumption in scientific and engineering work. This literature has seldom been utilized in the study of organizations despite the fact that knowledge production and knowledge use in scientific and engineering organizations are presumed to be objective or independent of individual and social influences. In this article, the social studies of science literature as it conceptualizes and understands objectivity is reviewed. An analysis of the data on decision-making at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) during the years preceding the explosion of Challenger is carried out using concepts from this literature. Data on decision-making at NASA during the years preceding the explosion of Columbia are also analyzed. It is shown that the culture of objectivity at NASA interacted with time pressures to produce a misunderstanding of flight risk. This misunderstanding resulted from two general aspects of NASA's culture: (i) an over-confidence in quantitative data went hand-in-hand with a marginalization of nonquantifiable data, leading to an insensitivity to uncertainty and a loss of organizational memory; and (ii) problem definition and solution creation were constructed as if they were independent of organizational goals, resulting in an inaccurate estimation of risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Human Relations is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=13966110
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/0018726704044952
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 28
        StartPage: 691
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Authors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Space vehicle accidents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Aeronautics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Literature
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The culture of objectivity: Quantification, uncertainty, and the evaluation of risk at NASA.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Feldman, Steven P.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2004
              Type: published
              Y: 2004
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00187267
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 57
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Human Relations
              Type: main
ResultId 1