View in EDS

Technological literacy in nursing education: A scoping review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Technological literacy in nursing education: A scoping review.
Authors: Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves1 andrea.nes@ldh.no, Steindal, Simen Alexander1 simen.alexander.steindal@ldh.no, Larsen, Marie Hamilton1 marie.h.larsen@ldh.no, Heer, Hanne Camilla1 hanne.camilla.heer@ldh.no, Lærum-Onsager, Ellisiv1 ellisiv.onsager@ldh.no, Gjevjon, Edith Roth1 edith.gjevjon@ldh.no
Source: Journal of Professional Nursing. Mar2021, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p320-334. 15p.
Subject Terms: *Literacy, *Problem solving, *Nursing education, *Critical thinking, *Clinical competence, *Nursing students, *ERIC (Information retrieval system), Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, CINAHL database, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Systematic reviews, Technology, MEDLINE
Abstract: Nurses are the key professionals in the introduction, implementation, and use of technology in clinical practice. A lack of technical expertise and technological understanding poses a challenge to the quality of health services and possibly to the safety, dignity, and quality of life of patients. Therefore, possessing technological literacy upon completing nursing baccalaureate studies is essential. However, no previous scoping review has mapped the existing studies of technological literacy in nursing education. To map and assess the published studies on technological literacy in nursing education and to identify how educational institutions operationalize, teach, measure, and maintain students' technological literacy throughout their educational programs. A scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The reporting was guided by the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC, and CINAHL was performed for studies published from January 2008 through March 2020. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. The reference lists of the included studies were also examined. The review included 28 papers from 27 studies. Three thematic groupings with their respective subgroups were identified among the included papers: 1) the acquisition (simulated electronic documentation, diversified learning methods, and evaluation learning focus), 2) the measurement (digital/computer literacy/competence, nursing informatics competence, technology acceptance, and students' interests and preferences in technology), and 3) the maintenance (follow-up evaluation) of technological knowledge and skills. Pedagogical models designed to teach an entire process for the acquisition, measurement, and maintenance of technological literacy are lacking. Studies are needed that bring technological competencies to a higher level, including problem-solving and critical thinking. Educators' competencies should be enhanced. Educational institutions need to ensure the readiness of future nurses for a technology-enriched environment by providing the necessary knowledge in technological literacy. Due to the importance of technological literacy to the nursing profession, educational institutions must ensure that it is taught to nursing students. • No studies addressed the complexity of technological literacy in nursing education • The substantial heterogeneity in the students' level of knowledge and competency regarding technology literacy mirrors the lack of evidence-based measures • Pedagogical models for teaching technological literacy in nursing education is needed • Educational institutions must ensure nursing students' technological literacy due to its importance for the development of critical thinking [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Professional Nursing is the property of W B Saunders and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 149838864
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Technological literacy in nursing education: A scoping review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nes%2C+Andréa+Aparecida+Gonçalves%22">Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> andrea.nes@ldh.no</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Steindal%2C+Simen+Alexander%22">Steindal, Simen Alexander</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> simen.alexander.steindal@ldh.no</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Larsen%2C+Marie+Hamilton%22">Larsen, Marie Hamilton</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> marie.h.larsen@ldh.no</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heer%2C+Hanne+Camilla%22">Heer, Hanne Camilla</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> hanne.camilla.heer@ldh.no</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lærum-Onsager%2C+Ellisiv%22">Lærum-Onsager, Ellisiv</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> ellisiv.onsager@ldh.no</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gjevjon%2C+Edith+Roth%22">Gjevjon, Edith Roth</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> edith.gjevjon@ldh.no</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Professional+Nursing%22">Journal of Professional Nursing</searchLink>. Mar2021, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p320-334. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literacy%22">Literacy</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+solving%22">Problem solving</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nursing+education%22">Nursing education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+thinking%22">Critical thinking</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+competence%22">Clinical competence</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nursing+students%22">Nursing students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ERIC+%28Information+retrieval+system%29%22">ERIC (Information retrieval system)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology%22">Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Nurses are the key professionals in the introduction, implementation, and use of technology in clinical practice. A lack of technical expertise and technological understanding poses a challenge to the quality of health services and possibly to the safety, dignity, and quality of life of patients. Therefore, possessing technological literacy upon completing nursing baccalaureate studies is essential. However, no previous scoping review has mapped the existing studies of technological literacy in nursing education. To map and assess the published studies on technological literacy in nursing education and to identify how educational institutions operationalize, teach, measure, and maintain students' technological literacy throughout their educational programs. A scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The reporting was guided by the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC, and CINAHL was performed for studies published from January 2008 through March 2020. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. The reference lists of the included studies were also examined. The review included 28 papers from 27 studies. Three thematic groupings with their respective subgroups were identified among the included papers: 1) the acquisition (simulated electronic documentation, diversified learning methods, and evaluation learning focus), 2) the measurement (digital/computer literacy/competence, nursing informatics competence, technology acceptance, and students' interests and preferences in technology), and 3) the maintenance (follow-up evaluation) of technological knowledge and skills. Pedagogical models designed to teach an entire process for the acquisition, measurement, and maintenance of technological literacy are lacking. Studies are needed that bring technological competencies to a higher level, including problem-solving and critical thinking. Educators' competencies should be enhanced. Educational institutions need to ensure the readiness of future nurses for a technology-enriched environment by providing the necessary knowledge in technological literacy. Due to the importance of technological literacy to the nursing profession, educational institutions must ensure that it is taught to nursing students. • No studies addressed the complexity of technological literacy in nursing education • The substantial heterogeneity in the students' level of knowledge and competency regarding technology literacy mirrors the lack of evidence-based measures • Pedagogical models for teaching technological literacy in nursing education is needed • Educational institutions must ensure nursing students' technological literacy due to its importance for the development of critical thinking [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Professional Nursing is the property of W B Saunders and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=149838864
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.01.008
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 320
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Problem solving
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nursing education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Critical thinking
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nursing students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: ERIC (Information retrieval system)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CINAHL database
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Technological literacy in nursing education: A scoping review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Steindal, Simen Alexander
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Larsen, Marie Hamilton
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heer, Hanne Camilla
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lærum-Onsager, Ellisiv
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gjevjon, Edith Roth
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 87557223
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Professional Nursing
              Type: main
ResultId 1