University students' epistemic profiles, conceptions of learning, and academic performance.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: University students' epistemic profiles, conceptions of learning, and academic performance.
Authors: Lonka, Kirsti1,2 kirsti.lonka@helsinki.fi, Ketonen, Elina1, Vermunt, Jan D.3,4
Source: Higher Education (00181560). Apr2021, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p775-793. 19p. 6 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *College student attitudes, *Academic achievement, *Reflective learning, *Metacognition, *Theory of knowledge, *Higher education, Epistemics
Abstract: University students' epistemic beliefs may have practical consequences for studying and success in higher education. Such beliefs constitute epistemic theories that may empirically manifest themselves as epistemic profiles. This study examined university students' epistemic profiles and their relations to conceptions of learning, age, gender, discipline, and academic achievement. The participants were 1515 students from five faculties who completed questionnaires about epistemic beliefs, including a subsample who also completed a questionnaire that included conceptions of learning. We measured epistemic beliefs: reflective learning, collaborative knowledge-building, valuing metacognition, certain knowledge, and practical value. First, we analyzed structural validity by using confirmatory factor analysis. Second, we conducted latent profile analysis that revealed three epistemic profiles: Pragmatic (49%), reflective-collaborative (26%) and fact-oriented (25%). Then, we compared the conceptions of learning across the profiles as well as demographic information, credits, and grades. The profiles' conceptions of learning varied: The reflective-collaborative group scored high on conception of learning named "construction of knowledge." Its members were more likely to be females, teachers, and mature students, and they had the highest academic achievement. The fact-oriented group (mostly engineering/science students) scored highest on "intake of knowledge." The pragmatic group scored highest on "use of knowledge:" During the second year, their academic achievement improved. In sum, the epistemic profiles were closely related to conceptions of learning and also associated with academic achievement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 150089427
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: University students' epistemic profiles, conceptions of learning, and academic performance.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lonka%2C+Kirsti%22">Lonka, Kirsti</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> kirsti.lonka@helsinki.fi</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ketonen%2C+Elina%22">Ketonen, Elina</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vermunt%2C+Jan+D%2E%22">Vermunt, Jan D.</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Higher+Education+%2800181560%29%22">Higher Education (00181560)</searchLink>. Apr2021, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p775-793. 19p. 6 Charts, 2 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+student+attitudes%22">College student attitudes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+achievement%22">Academic achievement</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflective+learning%22">Reflective learning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metacognition%22">Metacognition</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+of+knowledge%22">Theory of knowledge</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemics%22">Epistemics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: University students' epistemic beliefs may have practical consequences for studying and success in higher education. Such beliefs constitute epistemic theories that may empirically manifest themselves as epistemic profiles. This study examined university students' epistemic profiles and their relations to conceptions of learning, age, gender, discipline, and academic achievement. The participants were 1515 students from five faculties who completed questionnaires about epistemic beliefs, including a subsample who also completed a questionnaire that included conceptions of learning. We measured epistemic beliefs: reflective learning, collaborative knowledge-building, valuing metacognition, certain knowledge, and practical value. First, we analyzed structural validity by using confirmatory factor analysis. Second, we conducted latent profile analysis that revealed three epistemic profiles: Pragmatic (49%), reflective-collaborative (26%) and fact-oriented (25%). Then, we compared the conceptions of learning across the profiles as well as demographic information, credits, and grades. The profiles' conceptions of learning varied: The reflective-collaborative group scored high on conception of learning named "construction of knowledge." Its members were more likely to be females, teachers, and mature students, and they had the highest academic achievement. The fact-oriented group (mostly engineering/science students) scored highest on "intake of knowledge." The pragmatic group scored highest on "use of knowledge:" During the second year, their academic achievement improved. In sum, the epistemic profiles were closely related to conceptions of learning and also associated with academic achievement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=150089427
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10734-020-00575-6
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 775
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: College student attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reflective learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Metacognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Theory of knowledge
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epistemics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: University students' epistemic profiles, conceptions of learning, and academic performance.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lonka, Kirsti
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ketonen, Elina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vermunt, Jan D.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00181560
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 81
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Higher Education (00181560)
              Type: main
ResultId 1