View in EDS

Grade Incentive to Boost Course Evaluation Response Rates.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Grade Incentive to Boost Course Evaluation Response Rates.
Authors: Gordon, Helen1 (AUTHOR), Stevenson, Eleanor1 (AUTHOR), Brookhart, Ann1 (AUTHOR), Oermann, Marilyn H1 (AUTHOR) marilyn.oermann@duke.edu
Source: International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2018, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1-5. 5p. 1 Graph.
Subject Terms: *Course evaluation (Education), *Nursing schools, *Motivation (Psychology), *Students, *Nursing students, Stakeholder analysis, Satisfaction, Quality assurance
Abstract: Abstract In most schools of nursing, students rate their satisfaction with courses and teachers at the end of the semester. Low response rates on these evaluations make it difficult to interpret the results. Students were incentivized to complete their course evaluations by adding 1–2 points to one test score in the course in exchange for 85 % or higher participation by the total cohort. Ongoing monitoring and communication to students by faculty during the process was critical to motivating students to complete course evaluations. When the incentive was employed, student participation ranged from a low of 90 % to a high of 100 % response rate. The added points did not change any of the students' grades. Incentivizing students to complete course evaluations is an effective strategy to boost response rates without changing final course grades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 157167843
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Grade Incentive to Boost Course Evaluation Response Rates.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gordon%2C+Helen%22">Gordon, Helen</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stevenson%2C+Eleanor%22">Stevenson, Eleanor</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brookhart%2C+Ann%22">Brookhart, Ann</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oermann%2C+Marilyn+H%22">Oermann, Marilyn H</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> marilyn.oermann@duke.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Nursing+Education+Scholarship%22">International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship</searchLink>. 2018, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1-5. 5p. 1 Graph.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+evaluation+%28Education%29%22">Course evaluation (Education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nursing+schools%22">Nursing schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nursing+students%22">Nursing students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Satisfaction%22">Satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Abstract In most schools of nursing, students rate their satisfaction with courses and teachers at the end of the semester. Low response rates on these evaluations make it difficult to interpret the results. Students were incentivized to complete their course evaluations by adding 1–2 points to one test score in the course in exchange for 85 % or higher participation by the total cohort. Ongoing monitoring and communication to students by faculty during the process was critical to motivating students to complete course evaluations. When the incentive was employed, student participation ranged from a low of 90 % to a high of 100 % response rate. The added points did not change any of the students' grades. Incentivizing students to complete course evaluations is an effective strategy to boost response rates without changing final course grades. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=157167843
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1515/ijnes-2018-0031
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Course evaluation (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nursing schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nursing students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality assurance
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Grade Incentive to Boost Course Evaluation Response Rates.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gordon, Helen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stevenson, Eleanor
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brookhart, Ann
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oermann, Marilyn H
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1548923X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 15
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
              Type: main
ResultId 1