Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80.
Saved in:
| Title: | Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Daniel, Michelle1, Gottlieb, Michael2, Wooten, Darcy1, Stojan, Jennifer3, Haas, Mary R. C.3, Bailey, Jacob1, Evans, Sean1, Lee, Daniel1, Goldberg, Charles1,4, Fernandez, Jorge1, Jassal, Simerjot K.1,4, Rudolf, Frances1, Guluma, Kama1, Lander, Lina1, Pott, Emily1, Goldhaber, Nicole H.1, Thammasitboon, Satid5, Uraiby, Hussain6, Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran7, Gordon, Morris8 |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Dec2022, Vol. 44 Issue 12, p1313-1331. 19p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Graduate education, *Medical education, *School entrance requirements, *Medical students, *Students, *Student recruitment, *Masters programs (Higher education), *COVID-19 pandemic, *ERIC (Information retrieval system), Evidence-based nursing, Satisfaction, Ecological impact, Interviewing, Evaluation of human services programs, Descriptive statistics, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Online information services, Stakeholder analysis, Greenhouse gases, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems |
| Abstract: | The COVID-19 pandemic caused graduate medical education (GME) programs to pivot to virtual interviews (VIs) for recruitment and selection. This systematic review synthesizes the rapidly expanding evidence base on VIs, providing insights into preferred formats, strengths, and weaknesses. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, MedEdPublish, and Google Scholar were searched from 1 January 2012 to 21 February 2022. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument. Findings were reported according to Best Evidence in Medical Education guidance. One hundred ten studies were included. The majority (97%) were from North America. Fourteen were conducted before COVID-19 and 96 during the pandemic. Studies involved both medical students applying to residencies (61%) and residents applying to fellowships (39%). Surgical specialties were more represented than other specialties. Applicants preferred VI days that lasted 4–6 h, with three to five individual interviews (15–20 min each), with virtual tours and opportunities to connect with current faculty and trainees. Satisfaction with VIs was high, though both applicants and programs found VIs inferior to in-person interviews for assessing 'fit.' Confidence in ranking applicants and programs was decreased. Stakeholders universally noted significant cost and time savings with VIs, as well as equity gains and reduced carbon footprint due to eliminating travel. The use of VIs for GME recruitment and selection has accelerated rapidly. The findings of this review offer early insights that can guide future practice, policy, and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 160565505 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Daniel%2C+Michelle%22">Daniel, Michelle</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gottlieb%2C+Michael%22">Gottlieb, Michael</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wooten%2C+Darcy%22">Wooten, Darcy</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stojan%2C+Jennifer%22">Stojan, Jennifer</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Haas%2C+Mary+R%2E+C%2E%22">Haas, Mary R. C.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bailey%2C+Jacob%22">Bailey, Jacob</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Evans%2C+Sean%22">Evans, Sean</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+Daniel%22">Lee, Daniel</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Goldberg%2C+Charles%22">Goldberg, Charles</searchLink><relatesTo>1,4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fernandez%2C+Jorge%22">Fernandez, Jorge</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jassal%2C+Simerjot+K%2E%22">Jassal, Simerjot K.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rudolf%2C+Frances%22">Rudolf, Frances</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Guluma%2C+Kama%22">Guluma, Kama</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lander%2C+Lina%22">Lander, Lina</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pott%2C+Emily%22">Pott, Emily</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Goldhaber%2C+Nicole+H%2E%22">Goldhaber, Nicole H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thammasitboon%2C+Satid%22">Thammasitboon, Satid</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Uraiby%2C+Hussain%22">Uraiby, Hussain</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grafton-Clarke%2C+Ciaran%22">Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gordon%2C+Morris%22">Gordon, Morris</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Dec2022, Vol. 44 Issue 12, p1313-1331. 19p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+education%22">Graduate education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+entrance+requirements%22">School entrance requirements</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+students%22">Medical students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+recruitment%22">Student recruitment</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Masters+programs+%28Higher+education%29%22">Masters programs (Higher education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19+pandemic%22">COVID-19 pandemic</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ERIC+%28Information+retrieval+system%29%22">ERIC (Information retrieval system)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence-based+nursing%22">Evidence-based nursing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Satisfaction%22">Satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ecological+impact%22">Ecological impact</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+of+human+services+programs%22">Evaluation of human services programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Greenhouse+gases%22">Greenhouse gases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The COVID-19 pandemic caused graduate medical education (GME) programs to pivot to virtual interviews (VIs) for recruitment and selection. This systematic review synthesizes the rapidly expanding evidence base on VIs, providing insights into preferred formats, strengths, and weaknesses. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, MedEdPublish, and Google Scholar were searched from 1 January 2012 to 21 February 2022. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, full texts, performed data extraction, and assessed risk of bias using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument. Findings were reported according to Best Evidence in Medical Education guidance. One hundred ten studies were included. The majority (97%) were from North America. Fourteen were conducted before COVID-19 and 96 during the pandemic. Studies involved both medical students applying to residencies (61%) and residents applying to fellowships (39%). Surgical specialties were more represented than other specialties. Applicants preferred VI days that lasted 4–6 h, with three to five individual interviews (15–20 min each), with virtual tours and opportunities to connect with current faculty and trainees. Satisfaction with VIs was high, though both applicants and programs found VIs inferior to in-person interviews for assessing 'fit.' Confidence in ranking applicants and programs was decreased. Stakeholders universally noted significant cost and time savings with VIs, as well as equity gains and reduced carbon footprint due to eliminating travel. The use of VIs for GME recruitment and selection has accelerated rapidly. The findings of this review offer early insights that can guide future practice, policy, and research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=160565505 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2130038 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 1313 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Graduate education Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical education Type: general – SubjectFull: School entrance requirements Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical students Type: general – SubjectFull: Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student recruitment Type: general – SubjectFull: Masters programs (Higher education) Type: general – SubjectFull: COVID-19 pandemic Type: general – SubjectFull: ERIC (Information retrieval system) Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence-based nursing Type: general – SubjectFull: Satisfaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Ecological impact Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation of human services programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Online information services Type: general – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Greenhouse gases Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 80. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Daniel, Michelle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gottlieb, Michael – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wooten, Darcy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stojan, Jennifer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Haas, Mary R. C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bailey, Jacob – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Evans, Sean – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lee, Daniel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Goldberg, Charles – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fernandez, Jorge – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jassal, Simerjot K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rudolf, Frances – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Guluma, Kama – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lander, Lina – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pott, Emily – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Goldhaber, Nicole H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thammasitboon, Satid – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Uraiby, Hussain – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gordon, Morris IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0142159X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 12 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Teacher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |