Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.
Authors: Rager, Joshua B.1,2,3 jbrager@iu.edu, Kirch, Matthias4, Singer, Dianne C.5, Solway, Erica4, Malani, Preeti N.4,5, Roberts, J. Scott4,6, Kullgren, Jeffrey T.4,5,6,7
Source: Inquiry (00469580). 9/23/2024, p1-9. 9p.
Subject Terms: *Educational attainment, Cross-sectional method, Income, African Americans, Research funding, Consumer attitudes, Primary health care, Multiple regression analysis, COVID-19 testing, Early detection of cancer, Socioeconomic factors, Descriptive statistics, White people, Surveys, Race, Home diagnostic tests, Intention, Confidence intervals, Medical screening, Data analysis software, Genetic testing, Old age
Geographic Terms: United States
Abstract: The availability of direct-to-consumer, at-home medical tests has grown over the last decade, but it is unknown how frequently older adults purchase at-home tests, how they perceive such tests, and how interested they are in using at-home tests in the future. We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of non-institutionalized US adults aged 50 to 80 about their previous use of, perceptions of, and future intentions to use at-home medical tests. We found that nearly half of older adults (48.1%) have purchased an at-home medical test (95% CI 45.2%-51.0%), including 32.0% (95% CI 29.3%-34.8%) who purchased a COVID-19 test, 16.6% (95% CI 14.7%-18.7%) who purchased an at-home DNA or genetic test, 5.6% (95% CI 4.5%-7.0%) who purchased a screening test for cancer, and 4.4% (95% CI 3.4%-5.6%) who purchased a test for an infection other than COVID-19. Compared with White, non-Hispanic adults, Black, non-Hispanic adults were less likely to have purchased an at-home test (35.5% vs 49.6%, P <.01). Those with a college degree and those with an annual household income greater than $100K were more likely than others to have purchased at-home tests (55.5% vs 42.0%, P <.01; 60.6% vs 39.0%, P <.001, respectively). Most older adults had positive perceptions about at-home tests and expressed interest in using at-home tests in the future. At-home medical testing is now common among older adults. Clinicians should be familiar with different tests that patients can purchase and be prepared to discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of at-home testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Inquiry (00469580) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 179812468
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rager%2C+Joshua+B%2E%22&quot;&gt;Rager, Joshua B.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,2,3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;i&gt; jbrager@iu.edu&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kirch%2C+Matthias%22&quot;&gt;Kirch, Matthias&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Singer%2C+Dianne+C%2E%22&quot;&gt;Singer, Dianne C.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;5&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Solway%2C+Erica%22&quot;&gt;Solway, Erica&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Malani%2C+Preeti+N%2E%22&quot;&gt;Malani, Preeti N.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4,5&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Roberts%2C+J%2E+Scott%22&quot;&gt;Roberts, J. Scott&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4,6&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kullgren%2C+Jeffrey+T%2E%22&quot;&gt;Kullgren, Jeffrey T.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4,5,6,7&lt;/relatesTo&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Inquiry+%2800469580%29%22&quot;&gt;Inquiry (00469580)&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 9/23/2024, p1-9. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Educational+attainment%22&quot;&gt;Educational attainment&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cross-sectional+method%22&quot;&gt;Cross-sectional method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Income%22&quot;&gt;Income&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22African+Americans%22&quot;&gt;African Americans&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+funding%22&quot;&gt;Research funding&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Consumer+attitudes%22&quot;&gt;Consumer attitudes&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Primary+health+care%22&quot;&gt;Primary health care&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Multiple+regression+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Multiple regression analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22COVID-19+testing%22&quot;&gt;COVID-19 testing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Early+detection+of+cancer%22&quot;&gt;Early detection of cancer&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Socioeconomic+factors%22&quot;&gt;Socioeconomic factors&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Descriptive+statistics%22&quot;&gt;Descriptive statistics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22White+people%22&quot;&gt;White people&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Surveys%22&quot;&gt;Surveys&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Race%22&quot;&gt;Race&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Home+diagnostic+tests%22&quot;&gt;Home diagnostic tests&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Intention%22&quot;&gt;Intention&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Confidence+intervals%22&quot;&gt;Confidence intervals&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+screening%22&quot;&gt;Medical screening&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Data+analysis+software%22&quot;&gt;Data analysis software&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Genetic+testing%22&quot;&gt;Genetic testing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Old+age%22&quot;&gt;Old age&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22United+States%22&quot;&gt;United States&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The availability of direct-to-consumer, at-home medical tests has grown over the last decade, but it is unknown how frequently older adults purchase at-home tests, how they perceive such tests, and how interested they are in using at-home tests in the future. We conducted a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of non-institutionalized US adults aged 50 to 80 about their previous use of, perceptions of, and future intentions to use at-home medical tests. We found that nearly half of older adults (48.1%) have purchased an at-home medical test (95% CI 45.2%-51.0%), including 32.0% (95% CI 29.3%-34.8%) who purchased a COVID-19 test, 16.6% (95% CI 14.7%-18.7%) who purchased an at-home DNA or genetic test, 5.6% (95% CI 4.5%-7.0%) who purchased a screening test for cancer, and 4.4% (95% CI 3.4%-5.6%) who purchased a test for an infection other than COVID-19. Compared with White, non-Hispanic adults, Black, non-Hispanic adults were less likely to have purchased an at-home test (35.5% vs 49.6%, P &lt;.01). Those with a college degree and those with an annual household income greater than $100K were more likely than others to have purchased at-home tests (55.5% vs 42.0%, P &lt;.01; 60.6% vs 39.0%, P &lt;.001, respectively). Most older adults had positive perceptions about at-home tests and expressed interest in using at-home tests in the future. At-home medical testing is now common among older adults. Clinicians should be familiar with different tests that patients can purchase and be prepared to discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of at-home testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Inquiry (00469580) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=179812468
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/00469580241284168
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Educational attainment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Income
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: African Americans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Consumer attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Primary health care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multiple regression analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: COVID-19 testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Early detection of cancer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Socioeconomic factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: White people
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Race
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Home diagnostic tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical screening
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Genetic testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Old age
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rager, Joshua B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kirch, Matthias
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Singer, Dianne C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Solway, Erica
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Malani, Preeti N.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roberts, J. Scott
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kullgren, Jeffrey T.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 23
              M: 09
              Text: 9/23/2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00469580
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Inquiry (00469580)
              Type: main
ResultId 1