"Deprived and disadvantaged": federal advocacy for gifted youth in the United States, 1967–1987.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: "Deprived and disadvantaged": federal advocacy for gifted youth in the United States, 1967–1987.
Authors: Terzian, Sevan G.1 sterzian@coe.ufl.edu, Williams, Hannah2
Source: Paedagogica Historica. Oct2024, Vol. 60 Issue 5, p867-885. 19p.
Subject Terms: *Gifted & talented education, *Gifted persons, *Special education, *Compensatory education, *Educational equalization, Racial minorities
Company/Entity: United States. Office of Education
Abstract: In 1972, the United States Office of Education (USOE) released a lengthy and unprecedented report about gifted education in response to a Congressional mandate. Both Congress and the USOE lamented the inadequate state of gifted programmes in American schools and urged that gifted education should become a greater national priority. In this essay, we argue that the federal government revived human capital and national security concerns in claiming that the unfulfilled potential of gifted and talented Americans had made the United States vulnerable. Better accommodating students with high abilities therefore became a paramount political agenda item. At the same time, amid efforts to eliminate poverty and facilitate greater equality of educational opportunity, both the legislative and executive branches of the federal government strategically portrayed the gifted and talented as a neglected and historically disadvantaged group in need of assistance. In establishing a broader and multi-faceted definition of giftedness, moreover, the USOE paid particular attention to racial minorities who were also gifted as a way of making its case. Such arguments fit within the political climate of the Great Society in directing public resources to historically marginalized groups. Deviating from longstanding characterizations of the gifted as inherently white and privileged, the U.S. government in the late 1960s and early 1970s portrayed them as racially diverse, "deprived," "disadvantaged," and warranting special educational opportunities. This example of federal advocacy thus marked a notable shift in the image of the gifted student in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Paedagogica Historica is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 180359576
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: "Deprived and disadvantaged": federal advocacy for gifted youth in the United States, 1967–1987.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Terzian%2C+Sevan+G%2E%22">Terzian, Sevan G.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> sterzian@coe.ufl.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Williams%2C+Hannah%22">Williams, Hannah</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Paedagogica+Historica%22">Paedagogica Historica</searchLink>. Oct2024, Vol. 60 Issue 5, p867-885. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gifted+%26+talented+education%22">Gifted & talented education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gifted+persons%22">Gifted persons</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+education%22">Special education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Compensatory+education%22">Compensatory education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+equalization%22">Educational equalization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+minorities%22">Racial minorities</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectCompany
  Label: Company/Entity
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+Office+of+Education%22">United States. Office of Education</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In 1972, the United States Office of Education (USOE) released a lengthy and unprecedented report about gifted education in response to a Congressional mandate. Both Congress and the USOE lamented the inadequate state of gifted programmes in American schools and urged that gifted education should become a greater national priority. In this essay, we argue that the federal government revived human capital and national security concerns in claiming that the unfulfilled potential of gifted and talented Americans had made the United States vulnerable. Better accommodating students with high abilities therefore became a paramount political agenda item. At the same time, amid efforts to eliminate poverty and facilitate greater equality of educational opportunity, both the legislative and executive branches of the federal government strategically portrayed the gifted and talented as a neglected and historically disadvantaged group in need of assistance. In establishing a broader and multi-faceted definition of giftedness, moreover, the USOE paid particular attention to racial minorities who were also gifted as a way of making its case. Such arguments fit within the political climate of the Great Society in directing public resources to historically marginalized groups. Deviating from longstanding characterizations of the gifted as inherently white and privileged, the U.S. government in the late 1960s and early 1970s portrayed them as racially diverse, "deprived," "disadvantaged," and warranting special educational opportunities. This example of federal advocacy thus marked a notable shift in the image of the gifted student in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Paedagogica Historica is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=180359576
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/00309230.2023.2225424
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 867
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Gifted & talented education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gifted persons
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Special education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Compensatory education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational equalization
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Racial minorities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States. Office of Education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: "Deprived and disadvantaged": federal advocacy for gifted youth in the United States, 1967–1987.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Terzian, Sevan G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Williams, Hannah
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00309230
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 60
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Paedagogica Historica
              Type: main
ResultId 1