The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation.
Authors: Fisher, Darren Paul1 (AUTHOR), Brotto, Gaelle1 (AUTHOR), Lim, Iris2 (AUTHOR), Southam, Colette3 (AUTHOR) csoutham@bond.edu.au
Source: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Jun2025, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p622-631. 10p.
Subject Terms: *Academic motivation, *Formative evaluation, *Graduate students, *College students, *Educators
Abstract: While key attributes of effective feedback have frequently been included in studies on student learning, little research has focused on the impact of the timeliness of feedback on student motivation. By providing students with written feedback at 1, 3, 7, 10, or 14 days after submission, this mixed design study enriches our understanding of the feedback timeliness and its importance on student motivation. Based on survey data of undergraduate and postgraduate students from a wide range of disciplines including health and social sciences, screenwriting, business administration, and finance over a three-year period, our findings indicate that students express significantly lower levels of motivation if the feedback took greater than 10 days but they did not distinguish between 'timely' and 'extremely timely' feedback. Our quantitative analysis reveals that feedback comments and turnaround are significant determinants of student motivation, providing areas of focus for both educators and administrators. However, content of feedback showed the highest impact and our qualitative analysis supported this, with 57% of students mentioning content of the feedback. Students especially appreciate thorough, personalised, and specific assessment of strengths and weaknesses. Not surprisingly, 48% mentioned the importance of a high-quality educator, so great teaching is also important in motivating our students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 185658662
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fisher%2C+Darren+Paul%22">Fisher, Darren Paul</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brotto%2C+Gaelle%22">Brotto, Gaelle</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lim%2C+Iris%22">Lim, Iris</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Southam%2C+Colette%22">Southam, Colette</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> csoutham@bond.edu.au</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Assessment+%26+Evaluation+in+Higher+Education%22">Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education</searchLink>. Jun2025, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p622-631. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+motivation%22">Academic motivation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+evaluation%22">Formative evaluation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+students%22">Graduate students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educators%22">Educators</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: While key attributes of effective feedback have frequently been included in studies on student learning, little research has focused on the impact of the timeliness of feedback on student motivation. By providing students with written feedback at 1, 3, 7, 10, or 14 days after submission, this mixed design study enriches our understanding of the feedback timeliness and its importance on student motivation. Based on survey data of undergraduate and postgraduate students from a wide range of disciplines including health and social sciences, screenwriting, business administration, and finance over a three-year period, our findings indicate that students express significantly lower levels of motivation if the feedback took greater than 10 days but they did not distinguish between 'timely' and 'extremely timely' feedback. Our quantitative analysis reveals that feedback comments and turnaround are significant determinants of student motivation, providing areas of focus for both educators and administrators. However, content of feedback showed the highest impact and our qualitative analysis supported this, with 57% of students mentioning content of the feedback. Students especially appreciate thorough, personalised, and specific assessment of strengths and weaknesses. Not surprisingly, 48% mentioned the importance of a high-quality educator, so great teaching is also important in motivating our students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=185658662
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2449891
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 622
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Academic motivation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Formative evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduate students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educators
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Impact of Timely Formative Feedback on University Student Motivation.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fisher, Darren Paul
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brotto, Gaelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lim, Iris
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Southam, Colette
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02602938
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1