View in EDS PDF Full Text

Stuttering Representation on X: A Detailed Analysis of Content, Sentiment, and Influences.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Stuttering Representation on X: A Detailed Analysis of Content, Sentiment, and Influences.
Authors: Rasoli Jokar, Amir Hossein1 Rasoliam@msu.edu, Salehi, Sadaf2, Yaruss, J. Scott1
Source: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Jul2025, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p2156-2169. 14p.
Subject Terms: *Occupational roles, *Stuttering, *Attitudes toward disabilities, *Emotions, *Research, *Health education, Social network analysis, Health attitudes, Privacy, Public opinion, Descriptive statistics, Patient advocacy, Thematic analysis, Health care reform, Text messages, Sentiment analysis, Social stigma, Medical ethics
Reviews & Products: Twitter (Web resource)
Abstract: Background and Aims: Social media shapes public perceptions of various topics, including health conditions and communication challenges, such as stuttering. This study analyzed the stuttering-related posts on X (formerly Twitter), a platform chosen for its unique features, including real-time interaction, concise messaging, and public accessibility. X's hashtag system also enables efficient tracking of trends and aggregating relevant posts, making it ideal for thematic and sentiment analysis. This study examined X to explore how stuttering is represented and perceived in top stuttering-related posts. It focused on these posts' themes, sentiments, and engagement patterns, as well as their influence on perceptions of stuttering on the platform. Method: In this exploratory study, data from 153 highly engaged posts containing the hashtag "#stuttering" were analyzed using sentiment analysis, thematic analysis, and network analysis. Posts were selected based on engagement scores calculated from the number of likes, comments, and reposts. Results: The sentiment analysis revealed that 69.93% of posts conveyed positive sentiments, with the majority of these posted by self-identified stuttering advocates, while 6.54% reflected negative sentiments and 23.53% were neutral. Five key themes emerged from the data: (a) celebrating stuttering success, (b) enhancing awareness and education about stuttering, (c) navigating challenges through support, (d) addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma, and (e) systematic advocacy and policy reform. Network analysis reflected the critical role of health care professionals and advocacy organizations in shaping public perceptions. Conclusions: This study highlighted both the supportive and stigmatizing aspects of stuttering representation on X. While prominent figures and organizations drive positive engagement, targeted efforts are still needed to address negative stereotypes. These findings provide insights for future public health communication and advocacy strategies in the stuttering community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 186535587
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Stuttering Representation on X: A Detailed Analysis of Content, Sentiment, and Influences.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rasoli+Jokar%2C+Amir+Hossein%22">Rasoli Jokar, Amir Hossein</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> Rasoliam@msu.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Salehi%2C+Sadaf%22">Salehi, Sadaf</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yaruss%2C+J%2E+Scott%22">Yaruss, J. Scott</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Speech-Language+Pathology%22">American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology</searchLink>. Jul2025, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p2156-2169. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Occupational+roles%22">Occupational roles</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stuttering%22">Stuttering</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+toward+disabilities%22">Attitudes toward disabilities</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotions%22">Emotions</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+education%22">Health education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+network+analysis%22">Social network analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+attitudes%22">Health attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Privacy%22">Privacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+opinion%22">Public opinion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Patient+advocacy%22">Patient advocacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+care+reform%22">Health care reform</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Text+messages%22">Text messages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sentiment+analysis%22">Sentiment analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+stigma%22">Social stigma</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+ethics%22">Medical ethics</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectProduct
  Label: Reviews & Products
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="PS" term="%22Twitter+%28Web+resource%29%22">Twitter (Web resource)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background and Aims: Social media shapes public perceptions of various topics, including health conditions and communication challenges, such as stuttering. This study analyzed the stuttering-related posts on X (formerly Twitter), a platform chosen for its unique features, including real-time interaction, concise messaging, and public accessibility. X's hashtag system also enables efficient tracking of trends and aggregating relevant posts, making it ideal for thematic and sentiment analysis. This study examined X to explore how stuttering is represented and perceived in top stuttering-related posts. It focused on these posts' themes, sentiments, and engagement patterns, as well as their influence on perceptions of stuttering on the platform. Method: In this exploratory study, data from 153 highly engaged posts containing the hashtag "#stuttering" were analyzed using sentiment analysis, thematic analysis, and network analysis. Posts were selected based on engagement scores calculated from the number of likes, comments, and reposts. Results: The sentiment analysis revealed that 69.93% of posts conveyed positive sentiments, with the majority of these posted by self-identified stuttering advocates, while 6.54% reflected negative sentiments and 23.53% were neutral. Five key themes emerged from the data: (a) celebrating stuttering success, (b) enhancing awareness and education about stuttering, (c) navigating challenges through support, (d) addressing misconceptions and reducing stigma, and (e) systematic advocacy and policy reform. Network analysis reflected the critical role of health care professionals and advocacy organizations in shaping public perceptions. Conclusions: This study highlighted both the supportive and stigmatizing aspects of stuttering representation on X. While prominent figures and organizations drive positive engagement, targeted efforts are still needed to address negative stereotypes. These findings provide insights for future public health communication and advocacy strategies in the stuttering community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=186535587
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00375
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 2156
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Occupational roles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stuttering
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitudes toward disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social network analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Privacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public opinion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Patient advocacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Health care reform
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Text messages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sentiment analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social stigma
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Twitter (Web resource)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Stuttering Representation on X: A Detailed Analysis of Content, Sentiment, and Influences.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rasoli Jokar, Amir Hossein
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Salehi, Sadaf
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yaruss, J. Scott
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10580360
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
              Type: main
ResultId 1