Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review.
Authors: Myers, Tony1 (AUTHOR) drtonymyers@gmail.com, Buchanan, Jaime2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Sep2025, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p846-860. 15p.
Subject Terms: *Higher education, *Educational objectives, *Student engagement, Dialogics, Sociocultural factors, Communicative action, Critical discourse analysis
Abstract: This critical review examines the evolving conceptualization of dialogue in feedback literacies within higher education, presenting a nuanced theoretical framework that challenges traditional understanding of feedback interactions. Through a systematic analysis of 74 peer-reviewed articles, predominantly from the past decade, the paper identifies and categorizes three distinct levels of dialogic engagement: clarificatory, questioning, and critical. These levels align with established models of academic literacies, progressing from basic study skills through academic socialization to transformative critique. Drawing on Bakhtinian concepts of heteroglossia and answerability, the review articulates how dialogue in feedback operates not merely as verbal exchange but as a complex sociocultural process. The paper proposes an integrated matrix that maps dialogue types against student roles and feedback functions, demonstrating how different forms of dialogue serve distinct pedagogical purposes. This reconceptualization expands our understanding of feedback dialogue beyond traditional teacher-student interactions. The findings suggest that effective feedback literacy requires a more nuanced deployment of dialogue types based on specific learning contexts and objectives, while acknowledging the transformative potential of critical dialogue in challenging established academic hierarchies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 187780098
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Myers%2C+Tony%22">Myers, Tony</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> drtonymyers@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Buchanan%2C+Jaime%22">Buchanan, Jaime</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Assessment+%26+Evaluation+in+Higher+Education%22">Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education</searchLink>. Sep2025, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p846-860. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+objectives%22">Educational objectives</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+engagement%22">Student engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dialogics%22">Dialogics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sociocultural+factors%22">Sociocultural factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communicative+action%22">Communicative action</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+discourse+analysis%22">Critical discourse analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This critical review examines the evolving conceptualization of dialogue in feedback literacies within higher education, presenting a nuanced theoretical framework that challenges traditional understanding of feedback interactions. Through a systematic analysis of 74 peer-reviewed articles, predominantly from the past decade, the paper identifies and categorizes three distinct levels of dialogic engagement: clarificatory, questioning, and critical. These levels align with established models of academic literacies, progressing from basic study skills through academic socialization to transformative critique. Drawing on Bakhtinian concepts of heteroglossia and answerability, the review articulates how dialogue in feedback operates not merely as verbal exchange but as a complex sociocultural process. The paper proposes an integrated matrix that maps dialogue types against student roles and feedback functions, demonstrating how different forms of dialogue serve distinct pedagogical purposes. This reconceptualization expands our understanding of feedback dialogue beyond traditional teacher-student interactions. The findings suggest that effective feedback literacy requires a more nuanced deployment of dialogue types based on specific learning contexts and objectives, while acknowledging the transformative potential of critical dialogue in challenging established academic hierarchies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=187780098
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2478159
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 846
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Higher education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational objectives
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student engagement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dialogics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sociocultural factors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Communicative action
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Critical discourse analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Myers, Tony
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Buchanan, Jaime
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02602938
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1