View in EDS

Core dimensions and measurement characteristics of multidimensional nursing competency assessment instruments: A systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Core dimensions and measurement characteristics of multidimensional nursing competency assessment instruments: A systematic review.
Authors: Wang, Lianfeng1,2 (AUTHOR) 1002371844@ucsiuniversity.edu.my, Chen, Junlin1 (AUTHOR), Talib, Othman1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Professional Nursing. Nov2025, Vol. 61, p96-104. 9p.
Subject Terms: *National competency-based educational tests, *Factor analysis, *Predictive validity, Nursing audit, Medical quality control, CINAHL database, Research evaluation, Nursing, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Psychometrics, Online information services
Abstract: Nursing competency assessment is crucial for evaluating nurses' skills and ensuring the quality of patient care. However, existing instruments face limitations, including inconsistencies in core competency dimensions, incomplete psychometric validation, and limited cross-cultural applicability. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of multidimensional nursing competency assessment instruments and to identify recommendations for future assessment methods. The researchers followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between 2015 and 2025. The retrieval strategy was based on the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, using keywords such as "nursing competency," "assessment instruments," and "psychometric properties." COSMIN criteria (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) were used to assess psychometric quality. Twenty-five studies were included. Six core measurement dimensions were identified: Clinical Nursing Competency (100 % of instruments) and Communication & Teamwork (84 %) were the most common, whereas Leadership & Management Competency (40 %) and Evidence-Based Practice & Research Competency (28 %) were missing from some instruments. Most instruments demonstrated high internal consistency; 84 % of studies reported Cronbach's α ≥ 0.75. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used in 64 % of studies and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in 48 %, but many CFA models had low fit (CFI < 0.90). Only 20 % of studies reported predictive validity testing, suggesting that most instruments have not established long-term outcomes. Most assessment instruments show high reliability and internal consistency but lack sufficient structural and predictive validity, limiting their long-term effectiveness in evaluating nursing competency. The lack of cross-cultural validation also restricts their global applicability. Future research should prioritize the development of standardized, culturally adapted instruments with robust psychometric properties, potentially leveraging advanced assessment technologies to improve accuracy and usability. • A systematic review of 25 studies revealed six core nursing competency domains. • Tools showed strong reliability but limited structural and predictive validity. • Leadership and evidence-based practice competencies are often underrepresented. • Few instruments tested long-term outcomes, limiting practice applicability. • Calls for standardized, cross-cultural tools to guide education and the workforce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Professional Nursing is the property of W B Saunders and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 189648023
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Core dimensions and measurement characteristics of multidimensional nursing competency assessment instruments: A systematic review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Wang%2C+Lianfeng%22&quot;&gt;Wang, Lianfeng&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,2&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;i&gt; 1002371844@ucsiuniversity.edu.my&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Chen%2C+Junlin%22&quot;&gt;Chen, Junlin&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Talib%2C+Othman%22&quot;&gt;Talib, Othman&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Journal+of+Professional+Nursing%22&quot;&gt;Journal of Professional Nursing&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Nov2025, Vol. 61, p96-104. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22National+competency-based+educational+tests%22&quot;&gt;National competency-based educational tests&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Factor+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Factor analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Predictive+validity%22&quot;&gt;Predictive validity&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Nursing+audit%22&quot;&gt;Nursing audit&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+quality+control%22&quot;&gt;Medical quality control&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22CINAHL+database%22&quot;&gt;CINAHL database&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Research evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Nursing%22&quot;&gt;Nursing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Systematic+reviews%22&quot;&gt;Systematic reviews&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22MEDLINE%22&quot;&gt;MEDLINE&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Psychometrics%22&quot;&gt;Psychometrics&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Online+information+services%22&quot;&gt;Online information services&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Nursing competency assessment is crucial for evaluating nurses&#39; skills and ensuring the quality of patient care. However, existing instruments face limitations, including inconsistencies in core competency dimensions, incomplete psychometric validation, and limited cross-cultural applicability. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of multidimensional nursing competency assessment instruments and to identify recommendations for future assessment methods. The researchers followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL for studies published between 2015 and 2025. The retrieval strategy was based on the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework, using keywords such as &quot;nursing competency,&quot; &quot;assessment instruments,&quot; and &quot;psychometric properties.&quot; COSMIN criteria (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) were used to assess psychometric quality. Twenty-five studies were included. Six core measurement dimensions were identified: Clinical Nursing Competency (100 % of instruments) and Communication &amp; Teamwork (84 %) were the most common, whereas Leadership &amp; Management Competency (40 %) and Evidence-Based Practice &amp; Research Competency (28 %) were missing from some instruments. Most instruments demonstrated high internal consistency; 84 % of studies reported Cronbach&#39;s α ≥ 0.75. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used in 64 % of studies and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in 48 %, but many CFA models had low fit (CFI &lt; 0.90). Only 20 % of studies reported predictive validity testing, suggesting that most instruments have not established long-term outcomes. Most assessment instruments show high reliability and internal consistency but lack sufficient structural and predictive validity, limiting their long-term effectiveness in evaluating nursing competency. The lack of cross-cultural validation also restricts their global applicability. Future research should prioritize the development of standardized, culturally adapted instruments with robust psychometric properties, potentially leveraging advanced assessment technologies to improve accuracy and usability. • A systematic review of 25 studies revealed six core nursing competency domains. • Tools showed strong reliability but limited structural and predictive validity. • Leadership and evidence-based practice competencies are often underrepresented. • Few instruments tested long-term outcomes, limiting practice applicability. • Calls for standardized, cross-cultural tools to guide education and the workforce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Journal of Professional Nursing is the property of W B Saunders and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=189648023
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2025.09.013
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 96
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: National competency-based educational tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Predictive validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nursing audit
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical quality control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CINAHL database
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nursing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online information services
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Core dimensions and measurement characteristics of multidimensional nursing competency assessment instruments: A systematic review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Lianfeng
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Junlin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Talib, Othman
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 87557223
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 61
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Professional Nursing
              Type: main
ResultId 1