Sanctity of Life or God's Command? Investigating Religious Determinants of Attitudes Toward Three Cases of Unnatural Death: Capital Punishment, Abortion, and Euthanasia.
Saved in:
| Title: | Sanctity of Life or God's Command? Investigating Religious Determinants of Attitudes Toward Three Cases of Unnatural Death: Capital Punishment, Abortion, and Euthanasia. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Sabriseilabi, Soheil1 (AUTHOR) ssabriseilabi@troy.edu |
| Source: | Omega: Journal of Death & Dying. Mar2026, Vol. 92 Issue 4, p1754-1773. 20p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Decision making, Attitudes toward death, Psychology & religion, Descriptive statistics, Public opinion, Euthanasia, Odds ratio, Capital punishment, Attitudes toward abortion, Spirituality, Attitudes of medical personnel, Regression analysis |
| Geographic Terms: | Alabama |
| Abstract: | Whether individuals may decide to end other people's or their own lives has always been a matter of ethical and social debate. The current research explores attitudes toward three cases of unnatural death: capital punishment, abortion, and euthanasia. One considerable factor that shapes individuals' attitudes toward human intervention in death is religion. This paper argues that religion causes significant changes in individuals' mindsets toward human intervention in the death process. Therefore, the present research examines how religion affects attitudes toward the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia. This study proposes differentiating religion into four dimensions: religiosity, spirituality, afterlife beliefs, and religious affiliation. Using data from the 2018 wave of the General Social Survey (GSS), the present research found that religion's various dimensions have distinct effects on attitudes toward the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Omega: Journal of Death & Dying is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 191484114 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Sanctity of Life or God's Command? Investigating Religious Determinants of Attitudes Toward Three Cases of Unnatural Death: Capital Punishment, Abortion, and Euthanasia. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sabriseilabi%2C+Soheil%22">Sabriseilabi, Soheil</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ssabriseilabi@troy.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Omega%3A+Journal+of+Death+%26+Dying%22">Omega: Journal of Death & Dying</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 92 Issue 4, p1754-1773. 20p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+toward+death%22">Attitudes toward death</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+%26+religion%22">Psychology & religion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+opinion%22">Public opinion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Euthanasia%22">Euthanasia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Odds+ratio%22">Odds ratio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Capital+punishment%22">Capital punishment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+toward+abortion%22">Attitudes toward abortion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spirituality%22">Spirituality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+of+medical+personnel%22">Attitudes of medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alabama%22">Alabama</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Whether individuals may decide to end other people's or their own lives has always been a matter of ethical and social debate. The current research explores attitudes toward three cases of unnatural death: capital punishment, abortion, and euthanasia. One considerable factor that shapes individuals' attitudes toward human intervention in death is religion. This paper argues that religion causes significant changes in individuals' mindsets toward human intervention in the death process. Therefore, the present research examines how religion affects attitudes toward the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia. This study proposes differentiating religion into four dimensions: religiosity, spirituality, afterlife beliefs, and religious affiliation. Using data from the 2018 wave of the General Social Survey (GSS), the present research found that religion's various dimensions have distinct effects on attitudes toward the death penalty, abortion, and euthanasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Omega: Journal of Death & Dying is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=191484114 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/00302228231212658 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 1754 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitudes toward death Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychology & religion Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Public opinion Type: general – SubjectFull: Euthanasia Type: general – SubjectFull: Odds ratio Type: general – SubjectFull: Capital punishment Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitudes toward abortion Type: general – SubjectFull: Spirituality Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitudes of medical personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Alabama Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Sanctity of Life or God's Command? Investigating Religious Determinants of Attitudes Toward Three Cases of Unnatural Death: Capital Punishment, Abortion, and Euthanasia. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sabriseilabi, Soheil IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00302228 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 92 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Omega: Journal of Death & Dying Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
