When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192.
Saved in:
| Title: | When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cleland, J.1,2 (AUTHOR) Jennifer.cleland@ntu.edu.sg, Driessen, E.3 (AUTHOR), Masters, K.4 (AUTHOR), Lingard, L.5 (AUTHOR), Maggio, L. A.6 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Apr2026, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p542-553. 12p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Medical education standards, *Plagiarism, *Artificial intelligence, *Authorship, *Professional peer review, *Disclosure, Medical protocols, Professional ethics, Privacy, Publishing, Quality assurance, Medical ethics |
| Abstract: | Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are increasingly integrated into research and academic writing, offering opportunities to streamline workflows and increase productivity. However, these tools also introduce risks when used uncritically, unethically, or without transparency. In particular, the undisclosed use of GenAI, now widely documented, may compromise research integrity. The aim of this AMEE Guide is to provide researchers with practical guidance on when and how to disclose the use of GenAI in scholarly writing. Specifically, we propose a clear framework to promote ethical GenAI use and reporting practices in health professions education research. We start with an exploration of key aspects of responsible use of GenAI in publishing (e.g. authorship, verification and responsibility, plagiarism and bias, data privacy and confidentiality, journal requirements). We then address the importance of transparency about GenAI use in research production, both within research teams (internal disclosure) and to journals and readers (external disclosure). With respect to the latter, we highlight the need to be aware of journal-specific guidance and offer guiding principles for effective disclosure. Central to these principles is the call for scholars to provide a candid description of how GenAI was used, allowing readers to understand how the model shaped the research and writing processes. We also briefly consider the use and disclosure of GenAI in peer review. Given that, at the time of writing this Guide (November 2025), many questions remain regarding AI use and disclosure for publishing, we conclude with reflections on future developments and directions for research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
Be the first to leave a comment!
