Stretching the Truth: Identifying, Defining, and Measuring Confabulation for Speech-Language Pathologists Working With the Traumatic Brain Injury Population.
Saved in:
| Title: | Stretching the Truth: Identifying, Defining, and Measuring Confabulation for Speech-Language Pathologists Working With the Traumatic Brain Injury Population. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Cruse, Nicole1 crusen2@sacredheart.edu, Bogart, Elise2, Snapper, Jonah1, Sabo, Helena1, Diorio, Meghan1, Steel, Joanne3 |
| Source: | American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. May2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p867-883. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Communicative competence, *Speech-language pathology, *Discourse analysis, *Communicative disorders, *Quality of life, *Memory disorders, *Cognition, Rehabilitation for brain injury patients, Medical protocols, Delusions, Independent living, Rehabilitation, Hallucinations, Patient-professional relations, Cognition disorders, Brain injuries, Figures of speech, Disease complications |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Confabulation is a complex phenomenon that presents unique challenges for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) providing cognitive-communication rehabilitation for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, confabulation is conceptually poorly defined, and no clear descriptions or guidelines exist for the assessment or management of confabulation for SLPs. This tutorial provides a condensed background regarding underlying theories, differing etiologies, and previously used assessments and interventions in order to provide current recommendations for SLPs working with individuals with T BI who c onfabula te. Method: We conducted a literature review examining the history and clinical background of confabulation, methods of assessment, and intervention. This was used to identify gaps in knowledge, key theories, and traditionally used assessment and intervention strategies. Results: Various definitions of confabulation exist and differ by clinical diagnosis. Limited information is available within current best practice guidelines for cognitive-communication disorders. Current literature suggests use of metacognitive strategies, dynamic assessment, and tools such as patient interviews, journaling, and video feedback to address executive function deficits. However, the lack of specific clinical guidelines for confabulation often leads clinicians to rely on informal or ad hoc strategies that may not fully address the complexity of the behavior. Although some SLPs report confidence in identifying confabulation, this may not reflect a consistent or evidence-based approach in clinical practice. Conclusion: By increasing clinical awareness and providing direction for evidence-informed practice, SLPs can work with the multidisciplinary team to better identify and address confabulation, supporting clients' functional communication, social reintegration, and quality of life following TBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
Be the first to leave a comment!
