Speech-Language Pathologists' Responsivity During School-Based Therapy.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Speech-Language Pathologists' Responsivity During School-Based Therapy.
Authors:	Sun, Jing¹, Jhuo, Rong-An¹ jhuo.1@buckeyemail.osu.edu, Justice, Laura M.¹, Jiang, Hui¹
Source:	American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. May2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p1048-1062. 15p.
Subject Terms:	Speech therapists, Language disorders, School health services, Speech therapy, Language acquisition, Verbal behavior, Pearson correlation (Statistics), Research funding, Secondary analysis, Descriptive statistics, Mean length of utterance, Psychosocial factors, Regression analysis
Geographic Terms:	United States
Abstract:	Purpose: This study explored speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') verbal responsivity during school-based speech-language therapy sessions. Further, we examined the relations between SLP responsivity and child initial language skill and child talk during sessions, and the associations between SLP responsivity and child language gains over a school year. Method: Study methods involved a secondary analysis of 26 one-on-one schoolbased speech-language therapy sessions involving certified SLPs and children with developmental language disorder in the United States. Session data were manually transcribed and coded. Results: Therapy transcripts were manually coded to determine the categories and subcategories of SLPs' verbal responses to child utterances. These categories included responsivity (viz., recasts and expansions), prompt, repeat, labeling, clarification, praise, comment, acknowledgment, and missed opportunity, which, across sessions, showed wide variability. SLPs' responsivity accounted for less than 9% of temporally contingent utterances. Children's initial language skill in the fall and lower quantity and complexity of child talk during sessions were both negatively correlated with SLPs' responsivity. SLPs' responsivity was not associated with children's language gain 1 year late r. Conclusions: SLPs' responsivity during school-based therapy sessions demonstrated a low percentage among all SLP responses to children. This suggests that SLPs may need training and support in responsivity during therapy interactions. Importantly, however, the negative relationship between SLPs' responsivity and children's language skill and language production (in terms of quantity and complexity) suggest that SLPs may be more responsive with less-skilled children, thus providing heightened levels of linguistic stimulation. Study findings suggest numerous areas for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Purpose: This study explored speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') verbal responsivity during school-based speech-language therapy sessions. Further, we examined the relations between SLP responsivity and child initial language skill and child talk during sessions, and the associations between SLP responsivity and child language gains over a school year. Method: Study methods involved a secondary analysis of 26 one-on-one schoolbased speech-language therapy sessions involving certified SLPs and children with developmental language disorder in the United States. Session data were manually transcribed and coded. Results: Therapy transcripts were manually coded to determine the categories and subcategories of SLPs' verbal responses to child utterances. These categories included responsivity (viz., recasts and expansions), prompt, repeat, labeling, clarification, praise, comment, acknowledgment, and missed opportunity, which, across sessions, showed wide variability. SLPs' responsivity accounted for less than 9% of temporally contingent utterances. Children's initial language skill in the fall and lower quantity and complexity of child talk during sessions were both negatively correlated with SLPs' responsivity. SLPs' responsivity was not associated with children's language gain 1 year late r. Conclusions: SLPs' responsivity during school-based therapy sessions demonstrated a low percentage among all SLP responses to children. This suggests that SLPs may need training and support in responsivity during therapy interactions. Importantly, however, the negative relationship between SLPs' responsivity and children's language skill and language production (in terms of quantity and complexity) suggest that SLPs may be more responsive with less-skilled children, thus providing heightened levels of linguistic stimulation. Study findings suggest numerous areas for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	10580360
DOI:	10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00283