Revisiting Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in the Context of Mild Impairment.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Revisiting Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in the Context of Mild Impairment.
Authors: Senthilkumar, Harrinee1 harrinee1@gmail.com, Kelly, Lindsey1, Neal, Voss1, Diaz-Carr, Isidora1, Colavito, Michael1, Hillis, Argye E.1,2,3, Stockbridge, Melissa D.1,2
Source: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. May2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p1202-1211. 10p.
Subject Terms: *Predictive tests, *Retrospective studies, *Speech-language pathology, *Discourse analysis, *Longitudinal method, *Research methodology, *Evaluation, Diagnosis of aphasia, Task performance, Receiver operating characteristic curves, Research funding, Scientific observation, Photography, Descriptive statistics, Ischemic stroke, Convalescence, Medical records, Acquisition of data, Data analysis software, Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics), Disease complications
Abstract: Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) cutoff of 93.7 of 100 in detecting atypical discourse observed on a picture description task and to identify the optimal AQ value for detection of aphasia. Method: A total of 171 English-speaking adults with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke completed both the WAB-R and a description of either the Cookie Theft or the Modern Cookie Theft within 2 weeks of symptom onset as part of an ongoing longitudinal observational study of poststroke recovery of language. Picture descriptions were used to measure the quantity of content and the informational efficiency in syllables, which were compared to normative values. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the relationship between AQ and aphasic discourse and to determine the optimal AQ for detecting aphasic discourse. Results: The current AQ cutoff score was accurate in detecting aphasic discourse in 75% of cases (sensitivity = 77%; specificity = 64%). Most inaccurate classifications were due to the nearly one in five patients who demonstrated aphasic discourse but were deemed not aphasic by the WAB-R (false negatives). The optimal AQ cutoff was 96.7, calculated by maximizing Cohen's kappa (.38). This cutoff increased classification accuracy from 75% to 83% and reduced false negatives from 19% to 9%. Conclusion: Increasing the WAB-R AQ cutoff to 96.7 is an easily implementable adjustment that improves the detection of aphasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 193560220
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Revisiting Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in the Context of Mild Impairment.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Senthilkumar%2C+Harrinee%22">Senthilkumar, Harrinee</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> harrinee1@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kelly%2C+Lindsey%22">Kelly, Lindsey</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Neal%2C+Voss%22">Neal, Voss</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Diaz-Carr%2C+Isidora%22">Diaz-Carr, Isidora</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colavito%2C+Michael%22">Colavito, Michael</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hillis%2C+Argye+E%2E%22">Hillis, Argye E.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stockbridge%2C+Melissa+D%2E%22">Stockbridge, Melissa D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Speech-Language+Pathology%22">American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p1202-1211. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictive+tests%22">Predictive tests</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retrospective+studies%22">Retrospective studies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Speech-language+pathology%22">Speech-language pathology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discourse+analysis%22">Discourse analysis</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnosis+of+aphasia%22">Diagnosis of aphasia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+performance%22">Task performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Receiver+operating+characteristic+curves%22">Receiver operating characteristic curves</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+observation%22">Scientific observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Photography%22">Photography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ischemic+stroke%22">Ischemic stroke</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Convalescence%22">Convalescence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+records%22">Medical records</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acquisition+of+data%22">Acquisition of data</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensitivity+%26+specificity+%28Statistics%29%22">Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disease+complications%22">Disease complications</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) cutoff of 93.7 of 100 in detecting atypical discourse observed on a picture description task and to identify the optimal AQ value for detection of aphasia. Method: A total of 171 English-speaking adults with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke completed both the WAB-R and a description of either the Cookie Theft or the Modern Cookie Theft within 2 weeks of symptom onset as part of an ongoing longitudinal observational study of poststroke recovery of language. Picture descriptions were used to measure the quantity of content and the informational efficiency in syllables, which were compared to normative values. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the relationship between AQ and aphasic discourse and to determine the optimal AQ for detecting aphasic discourse. Results: The current AQ cutoff score was accurate in detecting aphasic discourse in 75% of cases (sensitivity = 77%; specificity = 64%). Most inaccurate classifications were due to the nearly one in five patients who demonstrated aphasic discourse but were deemed not aphasic by the WAB-R (false negatives). The optimal AQ cutoff was 96.7, calculated by maximizing Cohen's kappa (.38). This cutoff increased classification accuracy from 75% to 83% and reduced false negatives from 19% to 9%. Conclusion: Increasing the WAB-R AQ cutoff to 96.7 is an easily implementable adjustment that improves the detection of aphasia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=193560220
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2026_AJSLP-25-00361
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1202
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Predictive tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Speech-language pathology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discourse analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diagnosis of aphasia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Task performance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Receiver operating characteristic curves
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Photography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ischemic stroke
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Convalescence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical records
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disease complications
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Revisiting Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in the Context of Mild Impairment.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Senthilkumar, Harrinee
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kelly, Lindsey
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Neal, Voss
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Diaz-Carr, Isidora
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Colavito, Michael
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hillis, Argye E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stockbridge, Melissa D.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10580360
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
              Type: main
ResultId 1