Exploring barriers and facilitators to mobile technology integration in clinical education: A focus group study with students and stakeholders.
Saved in:
| Title: | Exploring barriers and facilitators to mobile technology integration in clinical education: A focus group study with students and stakeholders. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dobrowolska, Beata1 (AUTHOR), Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna2,3 (AUTHOR) ahuertasz.germanstrias@gencat.cat, Casanovas-Cuéllar, Cristina2,3 (AUTHOR), Dziurka, Magdalena1 (AUTHOR), Garcia-López, Carles4 (AUTHOR), Herbstreit, Stephanie5 (AUTHOR), Mäker, Daniela6 (AUTHOR), Ozdoba, Patrycja1 (AUTHOR), Martínez-Gaitero, Carlos4 (AUTHOR), Cabrera, Esther4 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Jun2026, Vol. 48 Issue 6, p1036-1049. 14p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Health services accessibility, *School environment, *Curriculum, *Medical education, *Academic medical centers, *Qualitative research, *Focus groups, *Philosophy of education, *Interprofessional relations, *Health occupations students, *Undergraduates, *Educational technology, *Research, *Student attitudes, *Learning strategies, *Comparative studies, Mobile apps, Clinical medicine, Professionalism, Research funding, Medical personnel, Interviewing, Questionnaires, Affinity groups, Pocket computers, Judgment sampling, Descriptive statistics, Thematic analysis, Conceptual structures, Stakeholder analysis, Psychosocial factors |
| Geographic Terms: | Poland, Germany, Spain |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Mobile learning (mLearning) is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for supporting clinical education by offering students flexible, real-time access to information within clinical learning environments (CLEs). However, its implementation is often hindered by infrastructural limitations, lack of institutional support and training, and concerns related to professionalism and patient perception. There is a lack of evidence that considers both student and stakeholder perspectives across different health education contexts. This study aimed to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to the integration of mLearning in clinical education from the perspectives of undergraduate health occupation students and clinical stakeholders. Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was used, involving six focus groups (FGs) with 25 students and 26 stakeholders from three European universities (Spain, Poland, and Germany). Data were analyzed thematically using the FRAME model (Framework for the Rational Analysis of Mobile Education). Research rigor was ensured through COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) guidelines and recognized qualitative research standards. Ethical approval was obtained from all institutions involved. Results: A total of 51 participants – 25 students and 26 stakeholders – contributed to six FGs across three countries. Thematic analysis, guided by the FRAME model, revealed key benefits and challenges of mLearning integration in clinical education. Participants highlighted the potential of mobile technology to enhance flexibility, access to knowledge, and peer collaboration in clinical education. However, significant challenges remain, including ethical concerns, generational divides, limited infrastructure, and institutional resistance. Discussion: Mobile technology offers clear benefits for clinical education – such as flexibility, access, and collaboration – but its integration requires addressing ethical, organizational, and generational barriers. Effective implementation demands inclusive, co-designed strategies supported by infrastructure, training, and cultural change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 193923656 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Exploring barriers and facilitators to mobile technology integration in clinical education: A focus group study with students and stakeholders. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dobrowolska%2C+Beata%22">Dobrowolska, Beata</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huertas-Zurriaga%2C+Ariadna%22">Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ahuertasz.germanstrias@gencat.cat</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Casanovas-Cuéllar%2C+Cristina%22">Casanovas-Cuéllar, Cristina</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dziurka%2C+Magdalena%22">Dziurka, Magdalena</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Garcia-López%2C+Carles%22">Garcia-López, Carles</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Herbstreit%2C+Stephanie%22">Herbstreit, Stephanie</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mäker%2C+Daniela%22">Mäker, Daniela</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ozdoba%2C+Patrycja%22">Ozdoba, Patrycja</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Martínez-Gaitero%2C+Carlos%22">Martínez-Gaitero, Carlos</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cabrera%2C+Esther%22">Cabrera, Esther</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 48 Issue 6, p1036-1049. 14p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+services+accessibility%22">Health services accessibility</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+environment%22">School environment</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+medical+centers%22">Academic medical centers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Focus+groups%22">Focus groups</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy+of+education%22">Philosophy of education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+occupations+students%22">Health occupations students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduates%22">Undergraduates</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+technology%22">Educational technology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+strategies%22">Learning strategies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mobile+apps%22">Mobile apps</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+medicine%22">Clinical medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professionalism%22">Professionalism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+personnel%22">Medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affinity+groups%22">Affinity groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pocket+computers%22">Pocket computers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Judgment+sampling%22">Judgment sampling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholder+analysis%22">Stakeholder analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poland%22">Poland</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spain%22">Spain</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Introduction: Mobile learning (mLearning) is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for supporting clinical education by offering students flexible, real-time access to information within clinical learning environments (CLEs). However, its implementation is often hindered by infrastructural limitations, lack of institutional support and training, and concerns related to professionalism and patient perception. There is a lack of evidence that considers both student and stakeholder perspectives across different health education contexts. This study aimed to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to the integration of mLearning in clinical education from the perspectives of undergraduate health occupation students and clinical stakeholders. Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was used, involving six focus groups (FGs) with 25 students and 26 stakeholders from three European universities (Spain, Poland, and Germany). Data were analyzed thematically using the FRAME model (Framework for the Rational Analysis of Mobile Education). Research rigor was ensured through COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) guidelines and recognized qualitative research standards. Ethical approval was obtained from all institutions involved. Results: A total of 51 participants – 25 students and 26 stakeholders – contributed to six FGs across three countries. Thematic analysis, guided by the FRAME model, revealed key benefits and challenges of mLearning integration in clinical education. Participants highlighted the potential of mobile technology to enhance flexibility, access to knowledge, and peer collaboration in clinical education. However, significant challenges remain, including ethical concerns, generational divides, limited infrastructure, and institutional resistance. Discussion: Mobile technology offers clear benefits for clinical education – such as flexibility, access, and collaboration – but its integration requires addressing ethical, organizational, and generational barriers. Effective implementation demands inclusive, co-designed strategies supported by infrastructure, training, and cultural change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=193923656 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2025.2607521 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 1036 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Health services accessibility Type: general – SubjectFull: School environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical education Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic medical centers Type: general – SubjectFull: Qualitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Focus groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Philosophy of education Type: general – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Health occupations students Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduates Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Student attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Mobile apps Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Professionalism Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Interviewing Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Affinity groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Pocket computers Type: general – SubjectFull: Judgment sampling Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures Type: general – SubjectFull: Stakeholder analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Poland Type: general – SubjectFull: Germany Type: general – SubjectFull: Spain Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Exploring barriers and facilitators to mobile technology integration in clinical education: A focus group study with students and stakeholders. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dobrowolska, Beata – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Casanovas-Cuéllar, Cristina – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dziurka, Magdalena – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Garcia-López, Carles – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Herbstreit, Stephanie – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mäker, Daniela – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ozdoba, Patrycja – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Martínez-Gaitero, Carlos – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cabrera, Esther IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0142159X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 48 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Teacher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |