A Catch-22 for Language Learners.
Saved in:
| Title: | A Catch-22 for Language Learners. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wright, Wayne E.1 wayne.wright@utsa.edu. |
| Source: | Educational Leadership. Best of 2006-2007, p14-18. 5p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Limited English-proficient students, *Language policy, *Test validity, *Language & education, *Students, *Education, *Language exams, *Native language & education, *Reading ability testing, *Adequate Yearly Progress (Education), *Education policy, *English language ability testing, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | This article examines how English language learners (ELLs) are handled by the U.S. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Limited English proficient (LEP) students are included in their schools' calculations of adequate yearly progress (AYP) and must show improvement on tests or their school will be labeled as failing. It is noted that while NCLB acknowledges that LEPs lack the language abilities to take tests as native English speakers, they are nonetheless required to take the exams and the body of students making up the LEP subgroup is shifting, making it difficult to show improvement over time. The option of testing students in their native language is considered as a solution but states do not administer them because of impracticality. |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 27796007 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Periodical PubTypeId: serialPeriodical PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Catch-22 for Language Learners. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wright%2C+Wayne+E%2E%22">Wright, Wayne E.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> wayne.wright@utsa.edu.</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Educational+Leadership%22">Educational Leadership</searchLink>. Best of 2006-2007, p14-18. 5p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Limited+English-proficient+students%22">Limited English-proficient students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+policy%22">Language policy</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+validity%22">Test validity</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+%26+education%22">Language & education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%22">Education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+exams%22">Language exams</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Native+language+%26+education%22">Native language & education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+ability+testing%22">Reading ability testing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adequate+Yearly+Progress+%28Education%29%22">Adequate Yearly Progress (Education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+policy%22">Education policy</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+language+ability+testing%22">English language ability testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22No+Child+Left+Behind+Act+of+2001%22">No Child Left Behind Act of 2001</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article examines how English language learners (ELLs) are handled by the U.S. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Limited English proficient (LEP) students are included in their schools' calculations of adequate yearly progress (AYP) and must show improvement on tests or their school will be labeled as failing. It is noted that while NCLB acknowledges that LEPs lack the language abilities to take tests as native English speakers, they are nonetheless required to take the exams and the body of students making up the LEP subgroup is shifting, making it difficult to show improvement over time. The option of testing students in their native language is considered as a solution but states do not administer them because of impracticality. |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=27796007 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 5 StartPage: 14 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Limited English-proficient students Type: general – SubjectFull: Language policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Test validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Language & education Type: general – SubjectFull: Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Language exams Type: general – SubjectFull: Native language & education Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading ability testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Adequate Yearly Progress (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Education policy Type: general – SubjectFull: English language ability testing Type: general – SubjectFull: No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Catch-22 for Language Learners. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wright, Wayne E. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Best of 2006-2007 Type: published Y: 2007 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00131784 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Leadership Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |