Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: school accountability in Norway.
Saved in:
| Title: | Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: school accountability in Norway. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Elstad, Eyvind1 eyvind.elstad@ils.uio.no |
| Source: | Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability. 2009, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p173-189. 17p. 2 Diagrams. |
| Subject Terms: | *School rankings, *Educational indicators, *Educational accountability, *School improvement programs |
| Geographic Terms: | Norway |
| Abstract: | Since Norway introduced tests and other types of measurements the press, with a negative bias, has placed the spotlight on those schools which performed badly in attainment measurements. The press reconstructs from public sources “league tables” of aggregated student achievements but at present the official position opposes the public ranking of schools. This article discusses the consequences within schools of such negative media coverage and the responses within badly performing schools that have been named, shamed and blamed in prominent headlines. This media spotlight brings into play a complex emotional process which may spur schools into improvement mechanisms or provoke a hostile reaction, or result in panic measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 40114402 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: school accountability in Norway. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Elstad%2C+Eyvind%22">Elstad, Eyvind</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> eyvind.elstad@ils.uio.no</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Educational+Assessment%2C+Evaluation+%26+Accountability%22">Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability</searchLink>. 2009, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p173-189. 17p. 2 Diagrams. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+rankings%22">School rankings</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+indicators%22">Educational indicators</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+accountability%22">Educational accountability</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+improvement+programs%22">School improvement programs</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Norway%22">Norway</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Since Norway introduced tests and other types of measurements the press, with a negative bias, has placed the spotlight on those schools which performed badly in attainment measurements. The press reconstructs from public sources “league tables” of aggregated student achievements but at present the official position opposes the public ranking of schools. This article discusses the consequences within schools of such negative media coverage and the responses within badly performing schools that have been named, shamed and blamed in prominent headlines. This media spotlight brings into play a complex emotional process which may spur schools into improvement mechanisms or provoke a hostile reaction, or result in panic measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=40114402 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s11092-009-9076-0 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 173 Subjects: – SubjectFull: School rankings Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational indicators Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: School improvement programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Norway Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Schools which are named, shamed and blamed by the media: school accountability in Norway. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Elstad, Eyvind IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: 2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 18748597 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 21 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
