APA (7th ed.) Citation

Coleman, J., Fenney, N., Trathan, P., Fox, A., Fox, E., Bennison, A., . . . Hollyman, P. (2025). A comparison of established and digital surface model (DSM) ‐based methods to determine population estimates and densities for king penguin colonies, using fixed‐wing drone and satellite imagery. Remote Sensing in Ecology & Conservation, 11(3), 294. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.424

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Coleman, J., N. Fenney, P.N Trathan, A. Fox, E. Fox, A. Bennison, L. Ireland, M.A Collins, and P.R Hollyman. "A Comparison of Established and Digital Surface Model (DSM) ‐based Methods to Determine Population Estimates and Densities for King Penguin Colonies, Using Fixed‐wing Drone and Satellite Imagery." Remote Sensing in Ecology & Conservation 11, no. 3 (2025): 294. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.424.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Coleman, J., et al. "A Comparison of Established and Digital Surface Model (DSM) ‐based Methods to Determine Population Estimates and Densities for King Penguin Colonies, Using Fixed‐wing Drone and Satellite Imagery." Remote Sensing in Ecology & Conservation, vol. 11, no. 3, 2025, p. 294, https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.424.