Medical practice and malpractice litigation in an evolutionary context.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Antoci, Angelo1, Fiori Maccioni, Alessandro1, Russu, Paolo1
Source: Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Sep2018, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p915-928. 14p. 3 Graphs.
Subject Terms: *Game theory, *Nash equilibrium, Defensive medicine, Physician practice patterns, Dynamics
Abstract: We model the interactions between the behaviors of physicians and patients, subject to clinical and legal risks, by means of evolutionary game theory. We propose an original game in which patients may sue their physician for medical malpractice, and physicians have to choose between two alternative treatments, with different levels of benefits and risks. The safer treatment is also the less effective, therefore its provision corresponds, under the assumptions of our model, to practicing negative defensive medicine. We study the Nash equilibria, test their stability in the replicator dynamics, and analyze their welfare properties. We find that the accuracy of the judicial system plays an important role, with possible counter-intuitive effects related to legal reforms. If the court is not sufficiently accurate, defensive medicine can be favored, paradoxically, by an increase in the probability that defensive physicians are sanctioned by the court. A similar outcome can be generated also by an increase in the compensation paid to patients by physicians, when sanctioned for medical malpractice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Database: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ent
DbLabel: Entrepreneurial Studies Source
An: 132001617
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Antoci%2C+Angelo%22">Antoci, Angelo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fiori+Maccioni%2C+Alessandro%22">Fiori Maccioni, Alessandro</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Russu%2C+Paolo%22">Russu, Paolo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Evolutionary+Economics%22">Journal of Evolutionary Economics</searchLink>. Sep2018, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p915-928. 14p. 3 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Game+theory%22">Game theory</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nash+equilibrium%22">Nash equilibrium</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Defensive+medicine%22">Defensive medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physician+practice+patterns%22">Physician practice patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dynamics%22">Dynamics</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We model the interactions between the behaviors of physicians and patients, subject to clinical and legal risks, by means of evolutionary game theory. We propose an original game in which patients may sue their physician for medical malpractice, and physicians have to choose between two alternative treatments, with different levels of benefits and risks. The safer treatment is also the less effective, therefore its provision corresponds, under the assumptions of our model, to practicing negative defensive medicine. We study the Nash equilibria, test their stability in the replicator dynamics, and analyze their welfare properties. We find that the accuracy of the judicial system plays an important role, with possible counter-intuitive effects related to legal reforms. If the court is not sufficiently accurate, defensive medicine can be favored, paradoxically, by an increase in the probability that defensive physicians are sanctioned by the court. A similar outcome can be generated also by an increase in the compensation paid to patients by physicians, when sanctioned for medical malpractice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ent&AN=132001617
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00191-018-0578-0
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 915
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Game theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nash equilibrium
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Defensive medicine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physician practice patterns
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dynamics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Medical practice and malpractice litigation in an evolutionary context.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Antoci, Angelo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fiori Maccioni, Alessandro
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Russu, Paolo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2018
              Type: published
              Y: 2018
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09369937
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 28
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Evolutionary Economics
              Type: main
ResultId 1