Design Portfolio, 1995. The Educational Facility Planner.
Saved in:
| Title: | Design Portfolio, 1995. The Educational Facility Planner. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Council of Educational Facility Planners, International, Scottsdale, AZ. |
| Source: | The Educational Facility Planner. 1995. |
| Availability: | Council of Educational Facility Planners, Intl., Executive Headquarters, 8687 E. Via de Ventura, Suite 311, Scottsdale, AZ 85258-3347 ($7.50). |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 43 |
| Publication Date: | 1995 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive Guides - Non-Classroom Collected Works - Serials |
| Descriptors: | Architectural Programming, Building Design, Building Innovation, Building Plans, Cost Effectiveness, Educational Facilities Design, Educational Facilities Planning, Elementary Secondary Education, Facility Guidelines, Higher Education, Space Utilization |
| Geographic Terms: | U.S.; Arizona |
| Abstract: | This document contains nationally recognized educational-facility designs, including the 1994 James D. MacConnell Award Winner--Heritage Oak Elementary School in Roseville, California. The architectural designs of other schools are also included--10 elementary schools, 6 high schools, 1 vocational school, 3 institutes of higher education, 1 intermediate school, and 1 fine arts school. Each section includes photographs, the building design, and a project description. Special challenges, the ways in which educational needs were met through design, and special considerations to cost-effectiveness are also highlighted. (LMI) |
| Notes: | Illustrations and photographs may not reproduce clearly. |
| Journal Code: | RIEFEB1996 |
| Entry Date: | 1996 |
| Accession Number: | ED386791 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | This document contains nationally recognized educational-facility designs, including the 1994 James D. MacConnell Award Winner--Heritage Oak Elementary School in Roseville, California. The architectural designs of other schools are also included--10 elementary schools, 6 high schools, 1 vocational school, 3 institutes of higher education, 1 intermediate school, and 1 fine arts school. Each section includes photographs, the building design, and a project description. Special challenges, the ways in which educational needs were met through design, and special considerations to cost-effectiveness are also highlighted. (LMI) |
|---|
