View in EDS

The Process of Developing Theories-in-Action with OELEs: A Qualitative Study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Process of Developing Theories-in-Action with OELEs: A Qualitative Study.
Language: English
Authors: Land, Susan M., Hannafin, Michael J.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 1996
Document Type: Reports - Research
Speeches/Meeting Papers
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Courseware, Decision Making, Educational Technology, Feedback, Grade 7, Hypothesis Testing, Junior High Schools, Learning Processes, Learning Theories, Microworlds, Science Instruction, Technology Integration
Abstract: Open-ended learning environments (OELEs) like microworlds have been touted as one approach for blending learning theory and emerging technology to support the building of student-centered understanding. The learning process involves developing a theory-in-action--an intuitive theory that is generated and changed by learners as they reflect upon experiences that either confirm or challenge the validity of the theory. The purpose of this study was to investigate how theories-in-action develop in collaboration with open-ended learning environments. The study examined the following questions: (1) What processes are used by learners to build and/or evolve a theory-in-action? (perception, organization, integration); (2) What intentions are used by learners to build and/or evolve a theory-in-action? (unsystematic searches, goal-based intentions, means-based intentions); and (3) How do learners use system features to build and/or evolve a theory-in-action? (awareness of features vs. awareness of how to use them to accomplish goals or test a hypothesis). Participants were four seventh-grade students drawn from a general science class. Findings were organized according to an analysis of system-based events, learner processing of events, and learner intentions for action. Results indicate that the process of developing theories-in-action in conjunction with OELEs appears to center around three primary areas: decisions about how to use the system; processing of system-generated feedback; and intentions for further action. The more closely linked these three components, the more likely a theory-in-action will develop and evolve. Further discussion focuses on over-reliance on visual cues and on the discovery of a situated learning paradox. (Contains 15 references.) (AEF)
Entry Date: 1996
Accession Number: ED397809
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED397809
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED397809
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Process of Developing Theories-in-Action with OELEs: A Qualitative Study.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Land%2C+Susan+M%2E%22">Land, Susan M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hannafin%2C+Michael+J%2E%22">Hannafin, Michael J.</searchLink>
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 11
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1996
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research<br />Speeches/Meeting Papers
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Courseware%22">Courseware</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback%22">Feedback</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hypothesis+Testing%22">Hypothesis Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Theories%22">Learning Theories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Microworlds%22">Microworlds</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Open-ended learning environments (OELEs) like microworlds have been touted as one approach for blending learning theory and emerging technology to support the building of student-centered understanding. The learning process involves developing a theory-in-action--an intuitive theory that is generated and changed by learners as they reflect upon experiences that either confirm or challenge the validity of the theory. The purpose of this study was to investigate how theories-in-action develop in collaboration with open-ended learning environments. The study examined the following questions: (1) What processes are used by learners to build and/or evolve a theory-in-action? (perception, organization, integration); (2) What intentions are used by learners to build and/or evolve a theory-in-action? (unsystematic searches, goal-based intentions, means-based intentions); and (3) How do learners use system features to build and/or evolve a theory-in-action? (awareness of features vs. awareness of how to use them to accomplish goals or test a hypothesis). Participants were four seventh-grade students drawn from a general science class. Findings were organized according to an analysis of system-based events, learner processing of events, and learner intentions for action. Results indicate that the process of developing theories-in-action in conjunction with OELEs appears to center around three primary areas: decisions about how to use the system; processing of system-generated feedback; and intentions for further action. The more closely linked these three components, the more likely a theory-in-action will develop and evolve. Further discussion focuses on over-reliance on visual cues and on the discovery of a situated learning paradox. (Contains 15 references.) (AEF)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1996
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED397809
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED397809
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Courseware
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision Making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade 7
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hypothesis Testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Junior High Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Theories
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Microworlds
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Integration
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Process of Developing Theories-in-Action with OELEs: A Qualitative Study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Land, Susan M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hannafin, Michael J.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 1996
ResultId 1