Evaluating New Approaches to Assessing Learning. CSE Report.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating New Approaches to Assessing Learning. CSE Report. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Shavelson, Richard, Ruiz-Primo, Maria Araceli, Li, Min, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA., California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 36 |
| Publication Date: | 2003 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED), Washington, DC. National Inst. on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment (ED/OERI), Washington, DC. |
| Contract Number: | R30560002 |
| Report Number: | CSE-R-604 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Knowledge Level, Models, Science Achievement, Scores, Student Evaluation |
| Geographic Terms: | U.S.; California |
| Abstract: | This paper presents a framework for evaluating cognitive claims to the interpretation of assessment scores and provides evidence of its applicability to science achievement. The idea of the "assessment triangle" (Pellegrino, Chodowsky, and Glaser, 2001) was adopted in the form of an assessment square with four tightly linked corners: construct (definition); assessment (task/response/score analysis); observation (cognitive and statistical data); and interpretation (link between observation and construct). In an iterative process of assessment review, the model focuses on four analyses that feed back on one another: conceptual, logical, cognitive, and statistical and qualitative. The heart of the model is a knowledge framework consisting of declarative (knowing that), procedural (knowing how), schematic (knowing why), and strategic (knowing when knowledge applies) knowledge that underlies achievement. Concrete examples of the model's application are provided. (Contains 6 tables, 10 figures, and 22 references.) (Author/SLD) |
| Journal Code: | RIEMAY2004 |
| Entry Date: | 2004 |
| Accession Number: | ED480904 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED480904 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED480904 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating New Approaches to Assessing Learning. CSE Report. – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shavelson%2C+Richard%22">Shavelson, Richard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruiz-Primo%2C+Maria+Araceli%22">Ruiz-Primo, Maria Araceli</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Min%22">Li, Min</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+Research+on+Evaluation%2C+Standards%2C+and+Student+Testing%2C+Los+Angeles%2C+CA%2E%22">National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22California+Univ%2E%2C+Los+Angeles%2E+Center+for+the+Study+of+Evaluation%2E%22">California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation.</searchLink> – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 36 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2003 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED), Washington, DC.<br />National Inst. on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment (ED/OERI), Washington, DC. – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: R30560002 – Name: NumberReport Label: Report Number Group: ID Data: CSE-R-604 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Assessment%22">Educational Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Achievement%22">Science Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22U%2ES%2E%3B+California%22">U.S.; California</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper presents a framework for evaluating cognitive claims to the interpretation of assessment scores and provides evidence of its applicability to science achievement. The idea of the "assessment triangle" (Pellegrino, Chodowsky, and Glaser, 2001) was adopted in the form of an assessment square with four tightly linked corners: construct (definition); assessment (task/response/score analysis); observation (cognitive and statistical data); and interpretation (link between observation and construct). In an iterative process of assessment review, the model focuses on four analyses that feed back on one another: conceptual, logical, cognitive, and statistical and qualitative. The heart of the model is a knowledge framework consisting of declarative (knowing that), procedural (knowing how), schematic (knowing why), and strategic (knowing when knowledge applies) knowledge that underlies achievement. Concrete examples of the model's application are provided. (Contains 6 tables, 10 figures, and 22 references.) (Author/SLD) – Name: CodeSource Label: Journal Code Group: SrcInfo Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JC" term="%22RIEMAY2004%22">RIEMAY2004</searchLink> – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2004 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED480904 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED480904 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 36 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: U.S.; California Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating New Approaches to Assessing Learning. CSE Report. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Los Angeles, CA. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: California Univ., Los Angeles. Center for the Study of Evaluation. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shavelson, Richard – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ruiz-Primo, Maria Araceli – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Min IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2003 |
| ResultId | 1 |