Improving Reading Outcomes for Students with or at Risk for Reading Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers. NCSER 2014-3000

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Improving Reading Outcomes for Students with or at Risk for Reading Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers. NCSER 2014-3000
Language: English
Authors: Connor, Carol M., Alberto, Paul A., Compton, Donald L., O'Connor, Rollanda E., National Center for Special Education Research (ED)
Source: National Center for Special Education Research. 2014.
Availability: National Center for Special Education Research. 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202. Tel: 800-437-0833; Fax: 202-401-0689; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 108
Publication Date: 2014
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Early Childhood Education
Preschool Education
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Learning Disabilities, Reading Skills, At Risk Students, Disability Identification, Cognitive Processes, Language Processing, Skill Development, Intervention, Reading Instruction, Faculty Development, Screening Tests, English Language Learners, Disabilities, Adaptive Testing, Cognitive Ability, Short Term Memory, Word Recognition, Reading Fluency, Dialects, Teaching Methods, Reading Comprehension, Peer Teaching, Cooperative Learning, Individualized Instruction, Severity (of Disability), Hearing Impairments, Mental Retardation, Knowledge Base for Teaching, Teacher Competencies, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Research, Early Intervention, Teacher Effectiveness, Literature Reviews, Response to Intervention, Cognitive Development, Thinking Skills, Language Skills, Student Characteristics, Behavior Problems, Vocabulary Development, Mild Mental Retardation, Moderate Mental Retardation
Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, No Child Left Behind Act 2001
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)
Abstract: Reading difficulties and disabilities present serious and potentially lifelong challenges. Children who do not read well are more likely to be retained a grade in school, drop out of high school, become a teen parent, or enter the juvenile justice system. Building on the extant research and seminal studies, including the National Reading Panel and the National Early Literacy Panel reports, research supported by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) has expanded understanding of ways to identify and help children who are at risk for reading disabilities. This body of work has also contributed to the identification of critical component skills that support proficient reading (e.g., phonological awareness, word knowledge, working memory), better ways to assess these skills, and more effective interventions for children at risk of developing reading difficulties, including children who are deaf or have intellectual disabilities. Research funded by IES has investigated ways to bring these efficacious interventions into our nation's classrooms by developing and evaluating professional development training that increases teachers' knowledge about literacy and how to teach reading effectively to all students, including students who are struggling to learn how to read. This is important because the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress reports that by fourth grade, one-third of our students are failing to attain basic reading skills. In this synthesis, the panel convened by IES, connects the building blocks of assessment, cognitive and linguistic components of reading, effective interventions, and teacher professional development to show how IES-funded research is contributing to solutions for improving reading and preventing reading difficulties. Based on the initial reading of the papers, and following an initial in-person meeting to discuss the articles that were read, the panel organized the contributions into four broad categories with component research questions. They are: (1) Assessment: What has been learned about effective identification and assessment of students who have or are at risk for reading difficulties or disabilities? (2) Basic Cognitive and Linguistic Processes: What are the basic cognitive and linguistic processes that support successful reading and how can these skills be improved for students who have or who are at risk for reading disabilities? (3) Intervention: How can reading instruction be more effective for students who have or are at risk for developing reading disabilities? How can reading be taught to students with low incidence disabilities? (4) Professional Development: How can research-based instructional practices be implemented in the classroom? These categories emerged directly from the articles that the panel members read and they reflect the areas the panel believes that IES-supported research has made contributions to in advancing the understanding of how to improve reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities. For each question, the panel synthesized the available research findings and highlighted key contributions. The panel was given the task of looking across the range of projects that IES has funded in this area to determine what has been learned, where progress has been made as a result of IES funding, and to provide suggestions for further research in improving reading skills of children with or at risk for reading disabilities. In reading this synthesis, readers should remember that it is not intended to be an overview of the existing research on improving reading for children with or at risk for reading disabilities. Panel members were only asked to review those published articles or book chapters that had emerged from IES-funded projects. Specifically, the panel was asked to review articles from peer-reviewed journals and book chapters from funded projects that were published or in press as of December 2011 (thus some articles that were in press in 2011 will have published dates in 2012 or 2013). Thus, there is a great deal of ongoing research that is not represented in this synthesis because some grants are not yet at the stage in the research process where findings are in and summarized for publication. Note also that reports of IES-funded research that have not been subjected to the peer-review process in publication are not included in this review. Appendix A lists the projects and publications that were reviewed for this synthesis.
Abstractor: ERIC
Number of References: 190
IES Funded: Yes
EIS Cited: ED560820
IES Publication: https://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCSER20143000
Entry Date: 2014
Accession Number: ED544759
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED544759
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED544759
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Improving Reading Outcomes for Students with or at Risk for Reading Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers. NCSER 2014-3000
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Connor%2C+Carol+M%2E%22">Connor, Carol M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alberto%2C+Paul+A%2E%22">Alberto, Paul A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Compton%2C+Donald+L%2E%22">Compton, Donald L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22O'Connor%2C+Rollanda+E%2E%22">O'Connor, Rollanda E.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Center+for+Special+Education+Research+%28ED%29%22">National Center for Special Education Research (ED)</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Center+for+Special+Education+Research%22"><i>National Center for Special Education Research</i></searchLink>. 2014.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: National Center for Special Education Research. 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202. Tel: 800-437-0833; Fax: 202-401-0689; Web site: http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 108
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2014
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Early+Childhood+Education%22">Early Childhood Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Preschool+Education%22">Preschool Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Difficulties%22">Reading Difficulties</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Disabilities%22">Learning Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Skills%22">Reading Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22At+Risk+Students%22">At Risk Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disability+Identification%22">Disability Identification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Processing%22">Language Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Skill+Development%22">Skill Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Instruction%22">Reading Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Screening+Tests%22">Screening Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+Language+Learners%22">English Language Learners</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disabilities%22">Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adaptive+Testing%22">Adaptive Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Ability%22">Cognitive Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short+Term+Memory%22">Short Term Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Word+Recognition%22">Word Recognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Fluency%22">Reading Fluency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dialects%22">Dialects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Comprehension%22">Reading Comprehension</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Teaching%22">Peer Teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+Learning%22">Cooperative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individualized+Instruction%22">Individualized Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Severity+%28of+Disability%29%22">Severity (of Disability)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+Impairments%22">Hearing Impairments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+Retardation%22">Mental Retardation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Base+for+Teaching%22">Knowledge Base for Teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Competencies%22">Teacher Competencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Legislation%22">Educational Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Early+Intervention%22">Early Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature+Reviews%22">Literature Reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Response+to+Intervention%22">Response to Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Development%22">Cognitive Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Skills%22">Language Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Characteristics%22">Student Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Problems%22">Behavior Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Development%22">Vocabulary Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mild+Mental+Retardation%22">Mild Mental Retardation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moderate+Mental+Retardation%22">Moderate Mental Retardation</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Individuals+with+Disabilities+Education+Act%22">Individuals with Disabilities Education Act</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22No+Child+Left+Behind+Act+2001%22">No Child Left Behind Act 2001</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Dynamic+Indicators+of+Basic+Early+Literacy+Skills+%28DIBELS%29%22">Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Reading difficulties and disabilities present serious and potentially lifelong challenges. Children who do not read well are more likely to be retained a grade in school, drop out of high school, become a teen parent, or enter the juvenile justice system. Building on the extant research and seminal studies, including the National Reading Panel and the National Early Literacy Panel reports, research supported by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) has expanded understanding of ways to identify and help children who are at risk for reading disabilities. This body of work has also contributed to the identification of critical component skills that support proficient reading (e.g., phonological awareness, word knowledge, working memory), better ways to assess these skills, and more effective interventions for children at risk of developing reading difficulties, including children who are deaf or have intellectual disabilities. Research funded by IES has investigated ways to bring these efficacious interventions into our nation's classrooms by developing and evaluating professional development training that increases teachers' knowledge about literacy and how to teach reading effectively to all students, including students who are struggling to learn how to read. This is important because the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress reports that by fourth grade, one-third of our students are failing to attain basic reading skills. In this synthesis, the panel convened by IES, connects the building blocks of assessment, cognitive and linguistic components of reading, effective interventions, and teacher professional development to show how IES-funded research is contributing to solutions for improving reading and preventing reading difficulties. Based on the initial reading of the papers, and following an initial in-person meeting to discuss the articles that were read, the panel organized the contributions into four broad categories with component research questions. They are: (1) Assessment: What has been learned about effective identification and assessment of students who have or are at risk for reading difficulties or disabilities? (2) Basic Cognitive and Linguistic Processes: What are the basic cognitive and linguistic processes that support successful reading and how can these skills be improved for students who have or who are at risk for reading disabilities? (3) Intervention: How can reading instruction be more effective for students who have or are at risk for developing reading disabilities? How can reading be taught to students with low incidence disabilities? (4) Professional Development: How can research-based instructional practices be implemented in the classroom? These categories emerged directly from the articles that the panel members read and they reflect the areas the panel believes that IES-supported research has made contributions to in advancing the understanding of how to improve reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities. For each question, the panel synthesized the available research findings and highlighted key contributions. The panel was given the task of looking across the range of projects that IES has funded in this area to determine what has been learned, where progress has been made as a result of IES funding, and to provide suggestions for further research in improving reading skills of children with or at risk for reading disabilities. In reading this synthesis, readers should remember that it is not intended to be an overview of the existing research on improving reading for children with or at risk for reading disabilities. Panel members were only asked to review those published articles or book chapters that had emerged from IES-funded projects. Specifically, the panel was asked to review articles from peer-reviewed journals and book chapters from funded projects that were published or in press as of December 2011 (thus some articles that were in press in 2011 will have published dates in 2012 or 2013). Thus, there is a great deal of ongoing research that is not represented in this synthesis because some grants are not yet at the stage in the research process where findings are in and summarized for publication. Note also that reports of IES-funded research that have not been subjected to the peer-review process in publication are not included in this review. Appendix A lists the projects and publications that were reviewed for this synthesis.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 190
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: EIS Cited
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: ED560820
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Publication
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCSER20143000" linkWindow="_blank">http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCSER20143000</link>
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2014
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED544759
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED544759
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 108
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Reading Difficulties
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: At Risk Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disability Identification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Processing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Skill Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faculty Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Screening Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English Language Learners
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disabilities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adaptive Testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Ability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Short Term Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Word Recognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Fluency
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dialects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reading Comprehension
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Peer Teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cooperative Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individualized Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Severity (of Disability)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hearing Impairments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental Retardation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge Base for Teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Competencies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Early Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Literature Reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Response to Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Characteristics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Behavior Problems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mild Mental Retardation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Moderate Mental Retardation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: No Child Left Behind Act 2001
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Improving Reading Outcomes for Students with or at Risk for Reading Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers. NCSER 2014-3000
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: National Center for Special Education Research (ED)
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Connor, Carol M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alberto, Paul A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Compton, Donald L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: O'Connor, Rollanda E.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: National Center for Special Education Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1