Paying for Improvement: Teacher Compensation Reform. re:VISION No. 04, Part 3
Saved in:
| Title: | Paying for Improvement: Teacher Compensation Reform. re:VISION No. 04, Part 3 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jackson, Stephen, Remer, Casey, Hunt Institute |
| Source: | Hunt Institute. 2014. |
| Availability: | Hunt Institute. 1000 Park Forty Plaza Suite 280, Durham, NC 27713. Tel: 919-425-4160; Fax: 919-425-4175; e-mail: info@hunt-institute.org; Web site: http://hunt-institute.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2014 |
| Intended Audience: | Policymakers |
| Document Type: | Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Teacher Salaries, Compensation (Remuneration), Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Qualifications, Teacher Certification, Context Effect, Incentive Grants, Merit Pay, Staff Utilization, Personnel Policy, Change Strategies, Case Studies, Administrative Policy, Teacher Employment Benefits, Teacher Motivation |
| Geographic Terms: | California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah |
| Abstract: | Policymakers know that improving teaching in our schools requires a systemic look at many policies related to educator effectiveness. For example, teacher preparation programs need to be dramatically improved and strengthened, but without accompanying reform in compensation, even highly effective and innovative schools of education are unlikely to continue attracting top students who have more lucrative post-degree options. Likewise, to carry out compensation reform successfully, states need thoughtful, fair systems for measuring teacher performance. This issue of re:VISION, part of a special series on teacher effectiveness, examines the role of educator compensation through this lens and offers considerations for policymakers who are examining teacher compensation in their states. [For Part 1 of this series, see ED559385; for Part 2, see ED559387; for Part 4, see ED559388; and for Part 5, see ED559391.] |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 33 |
| Entry Date: | 2015 |
| Accession Number: | ED559381 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED559381 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED559381 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Paying for Improvement: Teacher Compensation Reform. re:VISION No. 04, Part 3 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jackson%2C+Stephen%22">Jackson, Stephen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Remer%2C+Casey%22">Remer, Casey</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hunt+Institute%22">Hunt Institute</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Hunt+Institute%22"><i>Hunt Institute</i></searchLink>. 2014. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Hunt Institute. 1000 Park Forty Plaza Suite 280, Durham, NC 27713. Tel: 919-425-4160; Fax: 919-425-4175; e-mail: info@hunt-institute.org; Web site: http://hunt-institute.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 12 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2014 – Name: Audience Label: Intended Audience Group: Audnce Data: Policymakers – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Salaries%22">Teacher Salaries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Compensation+%28Remuneration%29%22">Compensation (Remuneration)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Qualifications%22">Teacher Qualifications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Certification%22">Teacher Certification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Context+Effect%22">Context Effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incentive+Grants%22">Incentive Grants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Merit+Pay%22">Merit Pay</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Staff+Utilization%22">Staff Utilization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personnel+Policy%22">Personnel Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Change+Strategies%22">Change Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Administrative+Policy%22">Administrative Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Employment+Benefits%22">Teacher Employment Benefits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Motivation%22">Teacher Motivation</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California%22">California</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Colorado%22">Colorado</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22District+of+Columbia%22">District of Columbia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Florida%22">Florida</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hawaii%22">Hawaii</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indiana%22">Indiana</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Iowa%22">Iowa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Louisiana%22">Louisiana</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Michigan%22">Michigan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minnesota%22">Minnesota</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nevada%22">Nevada</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+Mexico%22">New Mexico</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+York%22">New York</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ohio%22">Ohio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rhode+Island%22">Rhode Island</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tennessee%22">Tennessee</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Texas%22">Texas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Utah%22">Utah</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Policymakers know that improving teaching in our schools requires a systemic look at many policies related to educator effectiveness. For example, teacher preparation programs need to be dramatically improved and strengthened, but without accompanying reform in compensation, even highly effective and innovative schools of education are unlikely to continue attracting top students who have more lucrative post-degree options. Likewise, to carry out compensation reform successfully, states need thoughtful, fair systems for measuring teacher performance. This issue of re:VISION, part of a special series on teacher effectiveness, examines the role of educator compensation through this lens and offers considerations for policymakers who are examining teacher compensation in their states. [For Part 1 of this series, see ED559385; for Part 2, see ED559387; for Part 4, see ED559388; and for Part 5, see ED559391.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 33 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2015 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED559381 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED559381 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Teacher Salaries Type: general – SubjectFull: Compensation (Remuneration) Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Qualifications Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Certification Type: general – SubjectFull: Context Effect Type: general – SubjectFull: Incentive Grants Type: general – SubjectFull: Merit Pay Type: general – SubjectFull: Staff Utilization Type: general – SubjectFull: Personnel Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Change Strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Case Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Administrative Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Employment Benefits Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Motivation Type: general – SubjectFull: California Type: general – SubjectFull: Colorado Type: general – SubjectFull: District of Columbia Type: general – SubjectFull: Florida Type: general – SubjectFull: Hawaii Type: general – SubjectFull: Indiana Type: general – SubjectFull: Iowa Type: general – SubjectFull: Louisiana Type: general – SubjectFull: Michigan Type: general – SubjectFull: Minnesota Type: general – SubjectFull: Nevada Type: general – SubjectFull: New Mexico Type: general – SubjectFull: New York Type: general – SubjectFull: Ohio Type: general – SubjectFull: Rhode Island Type: general – SubjectFull: Tennessee Type: general – SubjectFull: Texas Type: general – SubjectFull: Utah Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Paying for Improvement: Teacher Compensation Reform. re:VISION No. 04, Part 3 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hunt Institute – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jackson, Stephen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Remer, Casey IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2014 Titles: – TitleFull: Hunt Institute Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |