A Critical Review of 'Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams'
Saved in:
| Title: | A Critical Review of 'Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams' |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Phelps, Richard P. (ORCID |
| Source: | Online Submission. 2020 16:1-28. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 28 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Education Level: | High Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | High School Students, Exit Examinations, Academic Achievement, Minimum Competencies, Minimum Competency Testing, Classification, Achievement Gains, Testing Problems, Accountability, Achievement Tests, Standardized Tests, Basic Skills, Norm Referenced Tests, Scores, High Stakes Tests, Longitudinal Studies |
| Geographic Terms: | Ohio, Georgia, New Jersey, North Carolina |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | California Achievement Tests, Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills, Metropolitan Achievement Tests, Otis Lennon School Ability Test, Stanford Achievement Tests, National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NCES) |
| Abstract: | This review critiques the highly-praised and influential 2001 study, "Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams," which concluded that "minimum competency," or high school "graduation exams," had no effect on student achievement. The review compares the test classifications of "Getting Tough?" to those in two contemporaneous federal government testing program surveys. The comparison suggests that "Getting Tough?" mis-classified several tests and, at the same time, failed to control for several factors highly correlated with test performance and student achievement gains, such as stakes, content, student effort, administration methods, security protocols, and the effect of other tests administered around the same time period. The influence of "Getting Tough?" went far beyond its own content, however, because the author and others asserted a methodological superiority over all previous scholarly work on the topic. Eventually, the number of states administering high school graduation exams would diminish from a large majority of them at the turn of the millennium to less than ten now. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Access URL: | https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Reviews/v16n4.htm |
| Accession Number: | ED625162 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED625162 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED625162 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Critical Review of 'Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams' – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Phelps%2C+Richard+P%2E%22">Phelps, Richard P.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-087X">0000-0003-4008-087X</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Online+Submission%22"><i>Online Submission</i></searchLink>. 2020 16:1-28. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 28 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Exit+Examinations%22">Exit Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minimum+Competencies%22">Minimum Competencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minimum+Competency+Testing%22">Minimum Competency Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Gains%22">Achievement Gains</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing+Problems%22">Testing Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Tests%22">Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standardized+Tests%22">Standardized Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Basic+Skills%22">Basic Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Norm+Referenced+Tests%22">Norm Referenced Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+Stakes+Tests%22">High Stakes Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+Studies%22">Longitudinal Studies</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ohio%22">Ohio</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Georgia%22">Georgia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22New+Jersey%22">New Jersey</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22North+Carolina%22">North Carolina</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22California+Achievement+Tests%22">California Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Comprehensive+Tests+of+Basic+Skills%22">Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Metropolitan+Achievement+Tests%22">Metropolitan Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Otis+Lennon+School+Ability+Test%22">Otis Lennon School Ability Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Stanford+Achievement+Tests%22">Stanford Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22National+Education+Longitudinal+Study+of+1988+%28NCES%29%22">National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NCES)</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This review critiques the highly-praised and influential 2001 study, "Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams," which concluded that "minimum competency," or high school "graduation exams," had no effect on student achievement. The review compares the test classifications of "Getting Tough?" to those in two contemporaneous federal government testing program surveys. The comparison suggests that "Getting Tough?" mis-classified several tests and, at the same time, failed to control for several factors highly correlated with test performance and student achievement gains, such as stakes, content, student effort, administration methods, security protocols, and the effect of other tests administered around the same time period. The influence of "Getting Tough?" went far beyond its own content, however, because the author and others asserted a methodological superiority over all previous scholarly work on the topic. Eventually, the number of states administering high school graduation exams would diminish from a large majority of them at the turn of the millennium to less than ten now. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: URL Label: Access URL Group: URL Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Reviews/v16n4.htm" linkWindow="_blank">https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Reviews/v16n4.htm</link> – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED625162 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED625162 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 28 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Exit Examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Minimum Competencies Type: general – SubjectFull: Minimum Competency Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Gains Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Standardized Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Basic Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Norm Referenced Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: High Stakes Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Ohio Type: general – SubjectFull: Georgia Type: general – SubjectFull: New Jersey Type: general – SubjectFull: North Carolina Type: general – SubjectFull: California Achievement Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Metropolitan Achievement Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Otis Lennon School Ability Test Type: general – SubjectFull: Stanford Achievement Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NCES) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Critical Review of 'Getting Tough? The Impact of High School Graduation Exams' Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Phelps, Richard P. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2020 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 16 Titles: – TitleFull: Online Submission Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |