Criticism as Asynchronous Collaboration: An Example from Social Science Research
Saved in:
| Title: | Criticism as Asynchronous Collaboration: An Example from Social Science Research |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Gelman, Andrew |
| Source: | Grantee Submission. 2022. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) Office of Naval Research (ONR) (DOD) |
| Contract Number: | R305D190048 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Criticism, Political Science, Social Science Research, Authors, Collaborative Writing, Writing for Publication, Statistical Analysis, Data Use, Statistical Significance, Reader Response |
| Abstract: | I discuss a published paper in political science that made a claim that aroused skepticism. The reanalysis is an example of how we, as consumers as well as producers of science, can engage with published work. This can be viewed as a sort of collaboration performed implicitly between the authors of a published paper and later researchers who want to understand or use the published work. [This paper was published in "Stat."] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | ED634352 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | I discuss a published paper in political science that made a claim that aroused skepticism. The reanalysis is an example of how we, as consumers as well as producers of science, can engage with published work. This can be viewed as a sort of collaboration performed implicitly between the authors of a published paper and later researchers who want to understand or use the published work. [This paper was published in "Stat."] |
|---|
