View in EDS

Criticism as Asynchronous Collaboration: An Example from Social Science Research

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Criticism as Asynchronous Collaboration: An Example from Social Science Research
Language: English
Authors: Gelman, Andrew
Source: Grantee Submission. 2022.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2022
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
Office of Naval Research (ONR) (DOD)
Contract Number: R305D190048
Document Type: Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Criticism, Political Science, Social Science Research, Authors, Collaborative Writing, Writing for Publication, Statistical Analysis, Data Use, Statistical Significance, Reader Response
Abstract: I discuss a published paper in political science that made a claim that aroused skepticism. The reanalysis is an example of how we, as consumers as well as producers of science, can engage with published work. This can be viewed as a sort of collaboration performed implicitly between the authors of a published paper and later researchers who want to understand or use the published work. [This paper was published in "Stat."]
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: ED634352
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED634352
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED634352
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Criticism as Asynchronous Collaboration: An Example from Social Science Research
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gelman%2C+Andrew%22">Gelman, Andrew</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2022.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 14
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2022
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)<br />Office of Naval Research (ONR) (DOD)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: R305D190048
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Evaluative
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Criticism%22">Criticism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+Science%22">Political Science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Science+Research%22">Social Science Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collaborative+Writing%22">Collaborative Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+for+Publication%22">Writing for Publication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Use%22">Data Use</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Significance%22">Statistical Significance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reader+Response%22">Reader Response</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: I discuss a published paper in political science that made a claim that aroused skepticism. The reanalysis is an example of how we, as consumers as well as producers of science, can engage with published work. This can be viewed as a sort of collaboration performed implicitly between the authors of a published paper and later researchers who want to understand or use the published work. [This paper was published in "Stat."]
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2023
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED634352
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED634352
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Criticism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Political Science
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Science Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Authors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Collaborative Writing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing for Publication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data Use
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical Significance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reader Response
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Criticism as Asynchronous Collaboration: An Example from Social Science Research
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gelman, Andrew
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 23
              M: 02
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Grantee Submission
              Type: main
ResultId 1