Like Mother, Like Daughter: Adults' Judgments about Genetic Inheritance

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Like Mother, Like Daughter: Adults' Judgments about Genetic Inheritance
Language: English
Authors: David Menendez, Olympia N. Mathiaparanam, Vienne Seitz, David Liu, Andrea Marquardt Donovan, Charles W. Kalish, Martha W. Alibali, Karl S. Rosengren
Source: Grantee Submission. 2023.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 48
Publication Date: 2023
Sponsoring Agency: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: R305B150003
1760940
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Heredity, Genetics, Adults, Probability, Misconceptions, Biology, Knowledge Level, College Students
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000436
Abstract: Do people think about genetic inheritance as a deterministic or probabilistic process? Do adults display systematic biases when reasoning about genetic inheritance? Knowing how adults think about genetic inheritance is valuable, both for understanding the developmental endpoint of these concepts and for identifying biases that persist even after formal education. In two studies, we examined adults' reasoning about genetic inheritance for familiar animals (Study 1) and unfamiliar animals (Study 2). First, participants were presented with animals that varied in eye color and were asked to judge whether each could be the offspring of a particular set of animal parents that had either the same or different eye colors. The potential offspring had eye colors that were either identical to the parents, blended the parents' eye colors, or differed from the parents. Next, participants predicted how six offspring of the animal parents would look. Participants judged a variety of choices as possible--not only the ones resembling the parents--suggesting that they thought genetic inheritance was a probabilistic process. Additionally, many participants thought that female offspring would look more like their mothers and male offspring would look more like their fathers. Thus, systemic biases in reasoning about inheritance persist into adulthood. [This paper was published in "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied" v29 n1 2023 (ISSN 1076-898X).]
Abstractor: As Provided
IES Funded: Yes
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED663733
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED663733
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED663733
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Like Mother, Like Daughter: Adults' Judgments about Genetic Inheritance
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Menendez%22">David Menendez</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Olympia+N%2E+Mathiaparanam%22">Olympia N. Mathiaparanam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vienne+Seitz%22">Vienne Seitz</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Liu%22">David Liu</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrea+Marquardt+Donovan%22">Andrea Marquardt Donovan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Charles+W%2E+Kalish%22">Charles W. Kalish</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Martha+W%2E+Alibali%22">Martha W. Alibali</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Karl+S%2E+Rosengren%22">Karl S. Rosengren</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Grantee+Submission%22"><i>Grantee Submission</i></searchLink>. 2023.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 48
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2023
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED)<br />National Science Foundation (NSF)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: R305B150003<br />1760940
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Heredity%22">Heredity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Genetics%22">Genetics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Probability%22">Probability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Misconceptions%22">Misconceptions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/xap0000436
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Do people think about genetic inheritance as a deterministic or probabilistic process? Do adults display systematic biases when reasoning about genetic inheritance? Knowing how adults think about genetic inheritance is valuable, both for understanding the developmental endpoint of these concepts and for identifying biases that persist even after formal education. In two studies, we examined adults' reasoning about genetic inheritance for familiar animals (Study 1) and unfamiliar animals (Study 2). First, participants were presented with animals that varied in eye color and were asked to judge whether each could be the offspring of a particular set of animal parents that had either the same or different eye colors. The potential offspring had eye colors that were either identical to the parents, blended the parents' eye colors, or differed from the parents. Next, participants predicted how six offspring of the animal parents would look. Participants judged a variety of choices as possible--not only the ones resembling the parents--suggesting that they thought genetic inheritance was a probabilistic process. Additionally, many participants thought that female offspring would look more like their mothers and male offspring would look more like their fathers. Thus, systemic biases in reasoning about inheritance persist into adulthood. [This paper was published in "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied" v29 n1 2023 (ISSN 1076-898X).]
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: CodeSource
  Label: IES Funded
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Yes
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED663733
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED663733
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/xap0000436
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 48
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Heredity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Genetics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adults
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Probability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Misconceptions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Like Mother, Like Daughter: Adults' Judgments about Genetic Inheritance
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: David Menendez
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Olympia N. Mathiaparanam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vienne Seitz
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: David Liu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andrea Marquardt Donovan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Charles W. Kalish
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Martha W. Alibali
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Karl S. Rosengren
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Grantee Submission
              Type: main
ResultId 1