The Revealed Preferences for School Reopening: Evidence from Public-School Disenrollment. EdWorkingPaper No. 21-446

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Revealed Preferences for School Reopening: Evidence from Public-School Disenrollment. EdWorkingPaper No. 21-446
Language: English
Authors: Thomas S. Dee, Elizabeth Huffaker, Cheryl Philips, Eric Sagara, Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University
Source: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. 2021.
Availability: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 33
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Early Childhood Education
Elementary Education
Kindergarten
Primary Education
Descriptors: Public Schools, Pandemics, COVID-19, School Closing, Distance Education, Electronic Learning, Declining Enrollment, In Person Learning, Kindergarten, Elementary Schools, Preferences, Educational Change, Evidence, Enrollment Rate, Enrollment Influences
Abstract: Before the 2020-21 school year, educators, policymakers, and parents confronted the stark and uncertain trade-offs implied by the health, educational, and economic consequences of offering instruction remotely, in person, or through a hybrid of the two. Most public schools in the U.S. chose remote-only instruction and enrollment fell dramatically (i.e., a loss of roughly 1.1 million K-12 students). We examine the impact of these choices on public-school enrollment using unique panel data that combine district-level enrollment trajectories with information on their instructional modes. We find offering remote-only instead of in-person instruction reduced enrollment by 1.1 percentage points (i.e., a 42 percent increase in disenrollment from -2.6 to -3.7 percent). The disenrollment effects of remote instruction are concentrated in kindergarten and, to a lesser extent, elementary schools. We do not find consistent evidence that remote instruction influenced middle or high-school enrollment or that hybrid instruction had an impact.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED671938
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Before the 2020-21 school year, educators, policymakers, and parents confronted the stark and uncertain trade-offs implied by the health, educational, and economic consequences of offering instruction remotely, in person, or through a hybrid of the two. Most public schools in the U.S. chose remote-only instruction and enrollment fell dramatically (i.e., a loss of roughly 1.1 million K-12 students). We examine the impact of these choices on public-school enrollment using unique panel data that combine district-level enrollment trajectories with information on their instructional modes. We find offering remote-only instead of in-person instruction reduced enrollment by 1.1 percentage points (i.e., a 42 percent increase in disenrollment from -2.6 to -3.7 percent). The disenrollment effects of remote instruction are concentrated in kindergarten and, to a lesser extent, elementary schools. We do not find consistent evidence that remote instruction influenced middle or high-school enrollment or that hybrid instruction had an impact.