How Surgical Residents Learn: Learning Style Preferences and Hybrid Scientific Conference Engagement
Saved in:
| Title: | How Surgical Residents Learn: Learning Style Preferences and Hybrid Scientific Conference Engagement |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Rachel Williams Newman |
| Source: | Online Submission. 2025Ed.D. Scholarly Research Project, Bradley University. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 95 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education Adult Education |
| Descriptors: | Surgery, Graduate Medical Education, Cognitive Style, Distance Education, Blended Learning, Experiential Learning, Conferences (Gatherings), Student Attitudes, Videoconferencing, Peer Relationship, Course Content, Accuracy, Age Differences, Measures (Individuals), Educational Change, COVID-19, Pandemics, Learning Theories, Well Being, Medical Students, Educational History, Andragogy |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Learning Style Inventory |
| Abstract: | Surgical resident learning style preferences in the wake of the rapid, widespread adoption of online learning technology during and following the COVID-19 pandemic is not widely studied. This study investigated learning style preferences of surgical residents in the context of engagement in a hybrid national scientific conference. Thirty-five surgical residents completed the Kolb Experiential Learning Profile (KELP) prior to attending the conference. Afterward, 26 completed a mixed methods survey. Login data were reviewed for online activity for all participants. Ninety-six percent of participants attended the conference in person and zero attended virtually only. Residents indicated focused time for learning and engaging with colleagues were most beneficial to their learning. Eighty-four percent were satisfied with the educational content provided. Results showed that 23% had an Acting learning style followed by Deciding at 20% and Balancing at 14%. Seventy-seven percent thought their KELP results were accurate and largely reinforced their existing learning approaches. Sixty-nine percent thought it would be helpful in their training while 84% thought it would be helpful in future professional development. Fifty-six percent planned to engage online, however only 7.7% did so, indicating the self-identified barrier of time prevented online engagement in education. Despite the small sample size, relationships between learning style and age and self-reported program size approached significance. Dedicated in-person learning is still effective and worthwhile for these learners. Experiential learning approaches may make in-person learning more impactful and microlearning may increase online engagement. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED672420 |
| Database: | ERIC |
Be the first to leave a comment!