View in EDS

Enhancing U.S. K-12 Competitiveness for the Agentic Generative AI Era: A Structured Framework for Educators and Policy Makers

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Enhancing U.S. K-12 Competitiveness for the Agentic Generative AI Era: A Structured Framework for Educators and Policy Makers
Language: English
Authors: Satyadhar Joshi (ORCID 0009-0002-6011-5080)
Source: Online Submission. 2025.
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2025
Intended Audience: Practitioners; Policymakers
Document Type: Information Analyses
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Integration, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Change, Curriculum Development, Faculty Development, Technological Literacy, Curriculum Implementation, Foreign Countries, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies, Global Approach
Geographic Terms: United States, Finland, China, United Kingdom, Germany
Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive framework for transforming K-12 education through systematic AI integration, addressing critical gaps in curriculum development and teacher preparedness. Drawing from extensive analysis of federal initiatives, including the 2025 White House Executive Order on advancing AI education, and synthesizing insights from recent scholarly and policy sources, we propose a multi-tiered approach to educational reform. This paper presents a strategic framework for transforming U.S. K-12 education through AI-integrated curriculum development and professional development programs. Our research reveals significant disparities in current implementation, with only 20-25% of educators feeling adequately prepared for AI integration despite 60-70% recognizing its importance. The framework encompasses AI literacy competencies across grade levels, differentiated professional development pathways, and a detailed technical architecture for generative AI tools in educational settings. We provide empirical evidence from international benchmarks, demonstrating that systematic approaches like Finland's "Generation AI" project achieve 80-90% teacher participation rates compared to 30-40% in U.S. programs. The proposed model includes phased implementation strategies, resource allocation frameworks totaling $7.2 million over three years, and comprehensive assessment mechanisms. Our findings indicate that schools implementing structured AI curricula report 25-35% higher student STEM engagement and 40-50% gains in computational thinking scores. The paper addresses critical ethical considerations, equity implications, and policy recommendations to guide sustainable AI integration while maintaining human-centered educational values. The proposed model aligns with national priorities for maintaining U.S. competitiveness in global AI education landscapes while ensuring equitable access and responsible AI implementation across diverse educational contexts. All results, projections, proposals are from cited literature.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: ED676035
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED676035
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED676035
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Enhancing U.S. K-12 Competitiveness for the Agentic Generative AI Era: A Structured Framework for Educators and Policy Makers
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Satyadhar+Joshi%22">Satyadhar Joshi</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6011-5080">0009-0002-6011-5080</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Online+Submission%22"><i>Online Submission</i></searchLink>. 2025.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 26
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: Audience
  Label: Intended Audience
  Group: Audnce
  Data: Practitioners; Policymakers
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Information Analyses
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Legislation%22">Educational Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Development%22">Curriculum Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Development%22">Faculty Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technological+Literacy%22">Technological Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Implementation%22">Curriculum Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross+Cultural+Studies%22">Cross Cultural Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Global+Approach%22">Global Approach</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Finland%22">Finland</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper presents a comprehensive framework for transforming K-12 education through systematic AI integration, addressing critical gaps in curriculum development and teacher preparedness. Drawing from extensive analysis of federal initiatives, including the 2025 White House Executive Order on advancing AI education, and synthesizing insights from recent scholarly and policy sources, we propose a multi-tiered approach to educational reform. This paper presents a strategic framework for transforming U.S. K-12 education through AI-integrated curriculum development and professional development programs. Our research reveals significant disparities in current implementation, with only 20-25% of educators feeling adequately prepared for AI integration despite 60-70% recognizing its importance. The framework encompasses AI literacy competencies across grade levels, differentiated professional development pathways, and a detailed technical architecture for generative AI tools in educational settings. We provide empirical evidence from international benchmarks, demonstrating that systematic approaches like Finland's "Generation AI" project achieve 80-90% teacher participation rates compared to 30-40% in U.S. programs. The proposed model includes phased implementation strategies, resource allocation frameworks totaling $7.2 million over three years, and comprehensive assessment mechanisms. Our findings indicate that schools implementing structured AI curricula report 25-35% higher student STEM engagement and 40-50% gains in computational thinking scores. The paper addresses critical ethical considerations, equity implications, and policy recommendations to guide sustainable AI integration while maintaining human-centered educational values. The proposed model aligns with national priorities for maintaining U.S. competitiveness in global AI education landscapes while ensuring equitable access and responsible AI implementation across diverse educational contexts. All results, projections, proposals are from cited literature.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED676035
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED676035
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Integration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Legislation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Change
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faculty Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technological Literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Implementation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross Cultural Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Global Approach
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Finland
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Germany
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Enhancing U.S. K-12 Competitiveness for the Agentic Generative AI Era: A Structured Framework for Educators and Policy Makers
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Satyadhar Joshi
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Online Submission
              Type: main
ResultId 1