Should Science Go to DIE: Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Saved in:
| Title: | Should Science Go to DIE: Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mason Goad, National Association of Scholars (NAS) |
| Source: | National Association of Scholars. 2025. |
| Availability: | National Association of Scholars. 221 Witherspoon Street 2nd Floor, Princeton, NJ 08542-3215. Tel: 609-683-7878; e-mail: nasonweb@nas.org; Web site: http://www.nas.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 39 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Science Education, College Science, Diversity Equity and Inclusion, Affirmative Action, Politics of Education, Ideology, Authoritarianism, Censorship, Freedom of Speech, Beliefs, Private Colleges |
| Geographic Terms: | Massachusetts |
| Abstract: | Despite its long-standing commitment to scientific education and research, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has fallen victim to a destructive ideology that has steadily infiltrated the institution over the past several decades--an ideology hidden under the banners of noble ideals such as Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity (DEI), and so-called "Anti-racism." This case study traces the history of DEI initiatives at MIT over the past three decades and illustrates how collegial discussions surrounding affirmative action programs and policies transformed into an authoritarian regime. In addition to the history of DEI at MIT, this report also explains succinctly DEI's ideological nature. The author exposes the way in which DEI is fundamentally opposed to science, why it is naturally authoritarian and censorial, and how MIT administrators have long denied this nature despite the facts and evidence to the contrary. The report concludes with a set of recommendations for concerned members of the MIT community, such as familiarizing themselves with DEI's underlying ideology on a deeper level and adopting the MIT Free Speech Alliances' recommendations to bolster free speech and civil discourse throughout the institute. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | ED677301 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED677301 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED677301 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Should Science Go to DIE: Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mason+Goad%22">Mason Goad</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22National+Association+of+Scholars+%28NAS%29%22">National Association of Scholars (NAS)</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22National+Association+of+Scholars%22"><i>National Association of Scholars</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National Association of Scholars. 221 Witherspoon Street 2nd Floor, Princeton, NJ 08542-3215. Tel: 609-683-7878; e-mail: nasonweb@nas.org; Web site: http://www.nas.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 39 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Education%22">Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Science%22">College Science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity+Equity+and+Inclusion%22">Diversity Equity and Inclusion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affirmative+Action%22">Affirmative Action</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Politics+of+Education%22">Politics of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ideology%22">Ideology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authoritarianism%22">Authoritarianism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Censorship%22">Censorship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Freedom+of+Speech%22">Freedom of Speech</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Beliefs%22">Beliefs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Private+Colleges%22">Private Colleges</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Massachusetts%22">Massachusetts</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Despite its long-standing commitment to scientific education and research, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has fallen victim to a destructive ideology that has steadily infiltrated the institution over the past several decades--an ideology hidden under the banners of noble ideals such as Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity (DEI), and so-called "Anti-racism." This case study traces the history of DEI initiatives at MIT over the past three decades and illustrates how collegial discussions surrounding affirmative action programs and policies transformed into an authoritarian regime. In addition to the history of DEI at MIT, this report also explains succinctly DEI's ideological nature. The author exposes the way in which DEI is fundamentally opposed to science, why it is naturally authoritarian and censorial, and how MIT administrators have long denied this nature despite the facts and evidence to the contrary. The report concludes with a set of recommendations for concerned members of the MIT community, such as familiarizing themselves with DEI's underlying ideology on a deeper level and adopting the MIT Free Speech Alliances' recommendations to bolster free speech and civil discourse throughout the institute. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED677301 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED677301 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 39 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Science Education Type: general – SubjectFull: College Science Type: general – SubjectFull: Diversity Equity and Inclusion Type: general – SubjectFull: Affirmative Action Type: general – SubjectFull: Politics of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Ideology Type: general – SubjectFull: Authoritarianism Type: general – SubjectFull: Censorship Type: general – SubjectFull: Freedom of Speech Type: general – SubjectFull: Beliefs Type: general – SubjectFull: Private Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Massachusetts Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Should Science Go to DIE: Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: National Association of Scholars (NAS) – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mason Goad IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: National Association of Scholars Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |