Alongside ESSA Level II Study (2024-25)
Saved in:
| Title: | Alongside ESSA Level II Study (2024-25) |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Molly Henschel, Justine Bautista, Alex Alberti, Instructure |
| Source: | Online Submission. 2025. |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Grade 5 Intermediate Grades Middle Schools Grade 6 Grade 7 Junior High Schools Secondary Education Grade 8 Grade 9 High Schools Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Mental Health, Attendance, Discipline, Grade 5, Grade 6, Grade 7, Grade 8, Grade 9, Grade 10, Grade 11, Grade 12, Individualized Programs, Coaching (Performance), Well Being, Computer Uses in Education, Daily Living Skills, Program Effectiveness, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students, High School Students |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Alongside is a comprehensive online well-being platform that helps students build life skills and access personalized support through clinician-created, AI-powered chat conversations and interactive features. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of Alongside on students' mental health, attendance, and disciplinary outcomes using a quasi-experimental design aligned with Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Level II (Moderate Evidence) standards. Methods: This ESSA Level II quasi-experimental study took place in Texas across three schools and examined implementation from November 2024 to May 2025. The sample included 474 students in grades 5-12: 416 students who used Alongside (treatment) and 59 students who did not (comparison). Implementation was measured using platform usage data, with primary emphasis on chat sessions created and descriptive metrics for feature engagement (e.g., goal setting/completion, journaling, video watching, mood tracking, and related activities). Student outcomes included validated mental health screeners (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [SDQ] subscales: emotional problems, conduct problems, peer problems, prosocial behavior; and Panorama SEL composites: self-efficacy, emotion regulation/self-management, and sense of belonging), district attendance rates, and disciplinary referral data. Impacts were estimated using linear regression models with student-level covariates (gender, baseline outcome measures) and propensity score weighting to account for potential pre-existing differences. Baseline equivalence testing indicated no statistically significant pre-intervention differences across outcomes (Hedges' g range: -0.21 to 0.14). Results: Implementation data showed that students used the platform primarily through chats, creating an average of 5.0 chat sessions (SD = 7.10; range 0-58) and sending an average of 47.37 messages (SD = 91.60; range 0-812). Students also engaged with other features, including mood tracking, journaling, goal setting, and video watching. In outcome analyses, Alongside users had significantly higher adjusted attendance compared to non-users (94% vs. 92%; p = 0.03; Hedges' g = 0.22). Over the 86 expected school days in the study period, this corresponded to fewer average absent days for Alongside users (5.2) than non-users (6.5). No statistically significant differences were found between users and non-users on mental health measures (SDQ and Panorama subscales/composites) or disciplinary referrals (all p > 0.05). Implications: Under an ESSA-aligned Level II quasi-experimental design meeting WWC baseline equivalence standards, Alongside use was associated with a statistically significant improvement in student attendance, supporting ESSA Level II (Moderate Evidence) for attendance outcomes. Findings suggest Alongside may help promote school engagement even when measurable differences in mental health screeners and discipline were not detected during the study window. Future research can strengthen the evidence base by examining dosage-response relationships (e.g., chats/messages and outcomes), extending follow-up periods, and testing effects in additional contexts and sites. [This report was prepared for Alongside by the Edtech Collective, Instructures Partner Ecosystem.] |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | ED678149 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED678149 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: ED678149 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Report PubTypeId: report PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Alongside ESSA Level II Study (2024-25) – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Molly+Henschel%22">Molly Henschel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Justine+Bautista%22">Justine Bautista</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alex+Alberti%22">Alex Alberti</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Instructure%22">Instructure</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Online+Submission%22"><i>Online Submission</i></searchLink>. 2025. – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 14 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Intermediate+Grades%22">Intermediate Grades</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+10%22">Grade 10</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+Health%22">Mental Health</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attendance%22">Attendance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discipline%22">Discipline</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+10%22">Grade 10</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+12%22">Grade 12</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individualized+Programs%22">Individualized Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coaching+%28Performance%29%22">Coaching (Performance)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Well+Being%22">Well Being</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Daily+Living+Skills%22">Daily Living Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+School+Students%22">Elementary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Middle+School+Students%22">Middle School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Strengths+and+Difficulties+Questionnaire%22">Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: Alongside is a comprehensive online well-being platform that helps students build life skills and access personalized support through clinician-created, AI-powered chat conversations and interactive features. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of Alongside on students' mental health, attendance, and disciplinary outcomes using a quasi-experimental design aligned with Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Level II (Moderate Evidence) standards. Methods: This ESSA Level II quasi-experimental study took place in Texas across three schools and examined implementation from November 2024 to May 2025. The sample included 474 students in grades 5-12: 416 students who used Alongside (treatment) and 59 students who did not (comparison). Implementation was measured using platform usage data, with primary emphasis on chat sessions created and descriptive metrics for feature engagement (e.g., goal setting/completion, journaling, video watching, mood tracking, and related activities). Student outcomes included validated mental health screeners (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [SDQ] subscales: emotional problems, conduct problems, peer problems, prosocial behavior; and Panorama SEL composites: self-efficacy, emotion regulation/self-management, and sense of belonging), district attendance rates, and disciplinary referral data. Impacts were estimated using linear regression models with student-level covariates (gender, baseline outcome measures) and propensity score weighting to account for potential pre-existing differences. Baseline equivalence testing indicated no statistically significant pre-intervention differences across outcomes (Hedges' g range: -0.21 to 0.14). Results: Implementation data showed that students used the platform primarily through chats, creating an average of 5.0 chat sessions (SD = 7.10; range 0-58) and sending an average of 47.37 messages (SD = 91.60; range 0-812). Students also engaged with other features, including mood tracking, journaling, goal setting, and video watching. In outcome analyses, Alongside users had significantly higher adjusted attendance compared to non-users (94% vs. 92%; p = 0.03; Hedges' g = 0.22). Over the 86 expected school days in the study period, this corresponded to fewer average absent days for Alongside users (5.2) than non-users (6.5). No statistically significant differences were found between users and non-users on mental health measures (SDQ and Panorama subscales/composites) or disciplinary referrals (all p > 0.05). Implications: Under an ESSA-aligned Level II quasi-experimental design meeting WWC baseline equivalence standards, Alongside use was associated with a statistically significant improvement in student attendance, supporting ESSA Level II (Moderate Evidence) for attendance outcomes. Findings suggest Alongside may help promote school engagement even when measurable differences in mental health screeners and discipline were not detected during the study window. Future research can strengthen the evidence base by examining dosage-response relationships (e.g., chats/messages and outcomes), extending follow-up periods, and testing effects in additional contexts and sites. [This report was prepared for Alongside by the Edtech Collective, Instructures Partner Ecosystem.] – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: ED678149 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED678149 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Mental Health Type: general – SubjectFull: Attendance Type: general – SubjectFull: Discipline Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 5 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 6 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 7 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 8 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 9 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 10 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 11 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 12 Type: general – SubjectFull: Individualized Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Coaching (Performance) Type: general – SubjectFull: Well Being Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Daily Living Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Middle School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Alongside ESSA Level II Study (2024-25) Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Instructure – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Molly Henschel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Justine Bautista – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Alex Alberti IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Titles: – TitleFull: Online Submission Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |