View in EDS

What Factors Predict CS Student Outcomes? Part 4 of the State of Computer Science in Illinois High Schools Series

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: What Factors Predict CS Student Outcomes? Part 4 of the State of Computer Science in Illinois High Schools Series
Language: English
Authors: Ying Chen, Stephanie M. Werner, Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative (IWERC)
Source: Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative, Discovery Partners Institute. 2025.
Availability: Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, State of Illinois for Discovery Partners Institute. 200 South Wacker Drive, 20th Floor, Chicago, IL 60304. Tel: 217-766-6779; e-mail: IWERC@mx.uillinois.edu; Web site: https://dpi.uillinois.edu/applied-research/iwerc/
Peer Reviewed: N
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: High Schools, Secondary School Curriculum, Computer Science Education, Prediction, Student Participation, Enrollment, Course Selection (Students), Trend Analysis, Student Characteristics, Demography, Teacher Characteristics, Grade Point Average, Course Content
Geographic Terms: Illinois
Abstract: The purpose of The State of Computer Science in Illinois High Schools Series is to analyze the landscape, structures, and pathways of computer science (CS) education in Illinois and to create a baseline by which to measure the expansion of CS education in the coming years. Beginning in the 2023-2024 school year, all districts in the state that serve grades 9-12 must offer every student the opportunity to enroll in a CS course. Because not all districts in the state had CS offerings before this school year, it is imperative to measure capacity for, access to, participation in, and experiences in CS education (i.e., CAPE framework) before and after the mandate went into effect. Analyzing trends through the lens of the CAPE framework will highlight progress while identifying existing gaps in providing equitable access and outcomes for all students. The first report of this Series provided an overview of the CS education landscape in the state by analyzing overall participation trends and details about the most enrolled CS courses. The second report analyzed the CS student body, focusing on students from historically marginalized backgrounds, including trends of their participation in general and rigorous coursework and course outcomes. The third report uncovered the characteristics and assignability patterns of high school CS teachers (i.e., how qualified CS teachers are staffed to certain CS courses) to assess the state's capacity to deliver equitable CS education. This fourth installment of the Series investigates the factors predicting student learning outcomes and continued enrollment in CS courses. Part 4 of the Series expands upon previous reports that detailed participation trends (Part 1), student demographics (Part 2), and teacher workforce characteristics (Part 3). Specifically, Part 4 examines how student-, teacher-, and course-related factors are associated with disparities in students' outcomes during the 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 school years (labeled as SY 2018 and SY 2022, respectively). Examining disparities in students' learning outcomes across multiple levels helps to identify characteristics and conditions associated with improved learning outcomes in high school CS courses and areas in need of improvement. This report considers student learning outcomes using two measures: (1) students' likelihood of receiving a passing grade in their CS course(s), and (2) their enrollment in a subsequent CS course. This dual measure approach is important because academic outcomes and continued participation reflect distinct but equally meaningful dimensions of students' experiences in CS. While a passing grade indicates mastery of course content, enrolling in a second course signals students' sustained interest, identity development, and access to long-term CS pathways.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: ED679334
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED679334
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: ED679334
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Report
PubTypeId: report
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: What Factors Predict CS Student Outcomes? Part 4 of the State of Computer Science in Illinois High Schools Series
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ying+Chen%22">Ying Chen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stephanie+M%2E+Werner%22">Stephanie M. Werner</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Illinois+Workforce+and+Education+Research+Collaborative+%28IWERC%29%22">Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative (IWERC)</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Illinois+Workforce+and+Education+Research+Collaborative%2C+Discovery+Partners+Institute%22"><i>Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative, Discovery Partners Institute</i></searchLink>. 2025.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, State of Illinois for Discovery Partners Institute. 200 South Wacker Drive, 20th Floor, Chicago, IL 60304. Tel: 217-766-6779; e-mail: IWERC@mx.uillinois.edu; Web site: https://dpi.uillinois.edu/applied-research/iwerc/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: N
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 26
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Curriculum%22">Secondary School Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Science+Education%22">Computer Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prediction%22">Prediction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Participation%22">Student Participation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Enrollment%22">Enrollment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Selection+%28Students%29%22">Course Selection (Students)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Trend+Analysis%22">Trend Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Characteristics%22">Student Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Demography%22">Demography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Characteristics%22">Teacher Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+Point+Average%22">Grade Point Average</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Content%22">Course Content</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Illinois%22">Illinois</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The purpose of The State of Computer Science in Illinois High Schools Series is to analyze the landscape, structures, and pathways of computer science (CS) education in Illinois and to create a baseline by which to measure the expansion of CS education in the coming years. Beginning in the 2023-2024 school year, all districts in the state that serve grades 9-12 must offer every student the opportunity to enroll in a CS course. Because not all districts in the state had CS offerings before this school year, it is imperative to measure capacity for, access to, participation in, and experiences in CS education (i.e., CAPE framework) before and after the mandate went into effect. Analyzing trends through the lens of the CAPE framework will highlight progress while identifying existing gaps in providing equitable access and outcomes for all students. The first report of this Series provided an overview of the CS education landscape in the state by analyzing overall participation trends and details about the most enrolled CS courses. The second report analyzed the CS student body, focusing on students from historically marginalized backgrounds, including trends of their participation in general and rigorous coursework and course outcomes. The third report uncovered the characteristics and assignability patterns of high school CS teachers (i.e., how qualified CS teachers are staffed to certain CS courses) to assess the state's capacity to deliver equitable CS education. This fourth installment of the Series investigates the factors predicting student learning outcomes and continued enrollment in CS courses. Part 4 of the Series expands upon previous reports that detailed participation trends (Part 1), student demographics (Part 2), and teacher workforce characteristics (Part 3). Specifically, Part 4 examines how student-, teacher-, and course-related factors are associated with disparities in students' outcomes during the 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 school years (labeled as SY 2018 and SY 2022, respectively). Examining disparities in students' learning outcomes across multiple levels helps to identify characteristics and conditions associated with improved learning outcomes in high school CS courses and areas in need of improvement. This report considers student learning outcomes using two measures: (1) students' likelihood of receiving a passing grade in their CS course(s), and (2) their enrollment in a subsequent CS course. This dual measure approach is important because academic outcomes and continued participation reflect distinct but equally meaningful dimensions of students' experiences in CS. While a passing grade indicates mastery of course content, enrolling in a second course signals students' sustained interest, identity development, and access to long-term CS pathways.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: ED679334
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=ED679334
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: High Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Curriculum
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Science Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prediction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Participation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Enrollment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Course Selection (Students)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Trend Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Characteristics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Demography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Characteristics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade Point Average
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Course Content
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Illinois
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: What Factors Predict CS Student Outcomes? Part 4 of the State of Computer Science in Illinois High Schools Series
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative (IWERC)
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ying Chen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stephanie M. Werner
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Illinois Workforce and Education Research Collaborative, Discovery Partners Institute
              Type: main
ResultId 1