Comparison versus Contrast: Task Specifics Affect Category Acquisition

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison versus Contrast: Task Specifics Affect Category Acquisition
Language: English
Authors: Ankowski, Amber A., Vlach, Haley A., Sandhofer, Catherine M.
Source: Infant and Child Development. Jan-Feb 2013 22(1):1-23.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2013
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Preschool Education
Descriptors: Preschool Children, Cognitive Development, Classification, Learning Processes, Statistical Analysis, Task Analysis
DOI: 10.1002/icd.1764
ISSN: 1522-7227
Abstract: A large literature has documented that comparison and contrast lead to better performance in a variety of tasks. However, studies of comparison and contrast present contradictory conclusions as to when and how these processes benefit learners. Across four studies, we examined how the specifics of the comparison and contrast task affect performance by systematically manipulating the feature variation and category structure in a category extension task performed by 3-year-old and 4-year-old children. Studies 1 (n?=?48, M?=?42.6?months) and 2 (n?=?48, M?=?42. 4?months) investigated comparison and contrast with high-density categories. Studies 3A (n?=?60, M?=?43.47?months), 3B (n?=?48, M?=?53. 2?months) and 4 (n?=?48, M?=?53.7?months) investigated comparison and contrast with low-density categories. Results indicated both category structure and feature variation affect the efficacy of comparison and contrast.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 58
Entry Date: 2014
Accession Number: EJ1032589
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first