Tell Me Why! Content Knowledge Predicts Process-Orientation of Math Researchers' and Math Teachers' Explanations
Saved in:
| Title: | Tell Me Why! Content Knowledge Predicts Process-Orientation of Math Researchers' and Math Teachers' Explanations |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Lachner, Andreas, Nückles, Matthias |
| Source: | Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences. Jun 2016 44(3):221-242. |
| Availability: | Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2016 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Predictor Variables, Educational Quality, Instructional Effectiveness, Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Teachers, Educational Researchers, Expertise, Mathematics, Professional Personnel, Comparative Analysis, Teaching Methods, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Learning Processes |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11251-015-9365-6 |
| ISSN: | 0020-4277 |
| Abstract: | In two studies, we investigated the impact of instructors' different knowledge bases on the quality of their instructional explanations. In Study 1, we asked 20 mathematics teachers (with high pedagogical content knowledge, but lower content knowledge) and 15 mathematicians (with lower pedagogical content knowledge, but high content knowledge) to provide an explanation about an extremum problem for students. We found that the explanations by teachers and mathematicians mainly differed in their process-orientation. Whereas the teachers mainly presented the solution steps for the problem (product-orientation), the mathematicians also provided information to clarify why a certain step in the solution was required (process-orientation). In Study 2, we investigated the effectiveness of these differing explanations. Eighty students either received a process-oriented mathematician's explanation, a product-oriented mathematics teacher's explanation, or no explanation for learning. We found that students who learned with a process-oriented explanation outperformed students who learned with a product-oriented explanation on an application test. Students who only had the problem but no explanation for learning showed the lowest learning gains. Apparently, deep content knowledge helped instructors generate explanations with high process-orientation, a textual feature that served as a valuable scaffold for students' understanding of mathematical procedures. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 28 |
| Entry Date: | 2016 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1104177 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwE2HwE2QXsD6PsP5OwueFpCAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDE-qGP_8007q-GO6cgIBEICBmvgorh9yM6dMo97Rg6q41k3PfBdroJPJ2fxxkBOxz_TtgbSndzCn5lKVh0p93dSKxMsJLBa6Ay18q4cCyu8z7GGSR6ohr2iw_CVqsu1K3rXNuL1BmftI55sxC1F1Pg8om1kNSJ_XLF_9u_OL2_3F51xF3A7rZnancPcn-Ujhgik0zUp7uVHaHWCCmAbU7aAH6m6qTLvRJM7GHVc= Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1104177 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Tell Me Why! Content Knowledge Predicts Process-Orientation of Math Researchers' and Math Teachers' Explanations – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lachner%2C+Andreas%22">Lachner, Andreas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nückles%2C+Matthias%22">Nückles, Matthias</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Instructional+Science%3A+An+International+Journal+of+the+Learning+Sciences%22"><i>Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences</i></searchLink>. Jun 2016 44(3):221-242. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 22 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2016 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pedagogical+Content+Knowledge%22">Pedagogical Content Knowledge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Instruction%22">Mathematics Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Teachers%22">Mathematics Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Researchers%22">Educational Researchers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+Personnel%22">Professional Personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scaffolding+%28Teaching+Technique%29%22">Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s11251-015-9365-6 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0020-4277 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In two studies, we investigated the impact of instructors' different knowledge bases on the quality of their instructional explanations. In Study 1, we asked 20 mathematics teachers (with high pedagogical content knowledge, but lower content knowledge) and 15 mathematicians (with lower pedagogical content knowledge, but high content knowledge) to provide an explanation about an extremum problem for students. We found that the explanations by teachers and mathematicians mainly differed in their process-orientation. Whereas the teachers mainly presented the solution steps for the problem (product-orientation), the mathematicians also provided information to clarify why a certain step in the solution was required (process-orientation). In Study 2, we investigated the effectiveness of these differing explanations. Eighty students either received a process-oriented mathematician's explanation, a product-oriented mathematics teacher's explanation, or no explanation for learning. We found that students who learned with a process-oriented explanation outperformed students who learned with a product-oriented explanation on an application test. Students who only had the problem but no explanation for learning showed the lowest learning gains. Apparently, deep content knowledge helped instructors generate explanations with high process-orientation, a textual feature that served as a valuable scaffold for students' understanding of mathematical procedures. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 28 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2016 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1104177 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1104177 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s11251-015-9365-6 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 221 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Pedagogical Content Knowledge Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Researchers Type: general – SubjectFull: Expertise Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional Personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Tell Me Why! Content Knowledge Predicts Process-Orientation of Math Researchers' and Math Teachers' Explanations Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lachner, Andreas – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nückles, Matthias IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2016 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0020-4277 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |