Should Students Assessed as Needing Remedial Mathematics Take College-Level Quantitative Courses Instead? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Should Students Assessed as Needing Remedial Mathematics Take College-Level Quantitative Courses Instead? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Language: English
Authors: Logue, A. W., Watanabe-Rose, Mari, Douglas, Daniel
Source: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Sep 2016 38(3):578-598.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Remedial Mathematics, College Mathematics, College Students, Randomized Controlled Trials, Algebra, Statistics, Workshops, Instructional Effectiveness, Comparative Analysis, Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Achievement
Geographic Terms: New York (New York)
DOI: 10.3102/0162373716649056
ISSN: 0162-3737
Abstract: Many college students never take, or do not pass, required remedial mathematics courses theorized to increase college-level performance. Some colleges and states are therefore instituting policies allowing students to take college-level courses without first taking remedial courses. However, no experiments have compared the effectiveness of these approaches, and other data are mixed. We randomly assigned 907 students to (a) remedial elementary algebra, (b) that course with workshops, or (c) college-level statistics with workshops (corequisite remediation). Students assigned to statistics passed at a rate 16 percentage points higher than those assigned to algebra (p < 0.001), and subsequently accumulated more credits. A majority of enrolled statistics students passed. Policies allowing students to take college-level instead of remedial quantitative courses can increase student success.
Abstractor: As Provided
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Reviewed: Meets Evidence Standards without Reservations
WWC Study Page: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Study/86040
Entry Date: 2016
Accession Number: EJ1108392
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first